2005
DOI: 10.3149/fth.0303.243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Reentry Process: How Parolees Adjust to Release from Prison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, persisting from the bivariate analysis, unmarried individuals were significantly more likely to complete the program relative to their married counterparts (OR=0.178). Clearly, this result is contrary to previous findings in much of the reentry and life-course literature (Bahr et al, 2005;Sampson & Laub, 1993;Visher, Debus-Sherrill, & Yahner, 2011) -although Simons and colleagues remind us that having a partner per se is not necessarily beneficial as far as involvement in criminal behavior is concerned (Simons, Stewart, Gordon, Conger, & Elder, 2002).…”
Section: Correlates Of Program Completioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, persisting from the bivariate analysis, unmarried individuals were significantly more likely to complete the program relative to their married counterparts (OR=0.178). Clearly, this result is contrary to previous findings in much of the reentry and life-course literature (Bahr et al, 2005;Sampson & Laub, 1993;Visher, Debus-Sherrill, & Yahner, 2011) -although Simons and colleagues remind us that having a partner per se is not necessarily beneficial as far as involvement in criminal behavior is concerned (Simons, Stewart, Gordon, Conger, & Elder, 2002).…”
Section: Correlates Of Program Completioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…Reentry literature states that family ties can become severely strained by the pressures involved with incarceration (Bahr et al, 2005;Travis & Waul, 2003). Reasons often cited by family members include personality changes related to incarceration, poor communication between partners, and the changing roles of family members throughout the incarceration and reentry processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nearly a quarter of formerly incarcerated fathers are not in a relationship, another quarter are visiting, about a third are cohabiting, and only 16% are married. Navigating family relationships is often quite complicated for fathers with an incarceration history though these ongoing relationships have been shown to reduce recidivism and provide support to reentering fathers (Bahr, Armstrong, Gibbs, Harris, & Fisher, 2005). Overall, formerly incarcerated fathers faced marked disadvantages in preexisting health, insurance coverage, labor market involvement, education, and relationship stability compared with their never-incarcerated counterparts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, parental incarceration creates a challenging situation for offenders to maintain their family relationships and parenting role. The ability to do so, however, is essential as most offenders intent to reunify with their families upon release (Bruns, 2006) and family relationships play a significant role in successful reintegration after release (Bahr, Armstrong, Gibbs, Harris, & Fisher, 2005;Cobbina, 2010). This study was guided by a family process model specifying that family relationships are maintained during incarceration through multiple mechanisms including, but not limited to, in-person visitation (Arditti, 2012a).…”
Section: Parental Incarceration and Family Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 98%