1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.1996.tb00098.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Record on Privatization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, privatization results in improved efficiency and profitability through increased accountability, and professionalism of private managers (Boycko et al, 1996;Dewenter and Malatesta, 1997). Megginson et al (1994Megginson et al ( , 1996 document significant improvements in operating performance in terms of sales, profitability, and capital spending in the post-privatization period. Finally, Dewenter and Malatesta (1997) observe that the pricing of privatization IPOs depends on the objectives of the domestic government.…”
Section: Privatization Of Government Controlled Firmsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition, privatization results in improved efficiency and profitability through increased accountability, and professionalism of private managers (Boycko et al, 1996;Dewenter and Malatesta, 1997). Megginson et al (1994Megginson et al ( , 1996 document significant improvements in operating performance in terms of sales, profitability, and capital spending in the post-privatization period. Finally, Dewenter and Malatesta (1997) observe that the pricing of privatization IPOs depends on the objectives of the domestic government.…”
Section: Privatization Of Government Controlled Firmsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Apart from the intention of the government, reform and privatization programmes need strong support and direction from the government (Megginson et al 1996). During the interviews, the World Bank, top management, and the consultants were forthcoming in underlining the commitment demonstrated by the Government of Orissa to implement the power sector reform.…”
Section: Orissa Power Sector After Reformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because pre-privatization (pre-structuring) firms tend to be over-manned and to pay excessive wages, incumbent employees have been afraid of privatization. 1 The privatization literature has been mostly concerned with motivation, optimal methods and the desirable post-privatization ownership structure (e.g., Baldwin and Bhattacharyya, 1991;Boardman and Vining, 1989;Bonin, 1992;Bös and Harms, 1997;Boycko et al, 1996;Estrin, 1994;Galal et al, 1992;Haskel and Szymanski, 1993;Hillman, 1992;Jackson and Price, 1994;Kay and Thompson, 1986;Katz and Owen, 1995;Laffont and Tirole, 1992;Megginson and Nash, 1994;Megginson et al, 1996;Roland, 1994;Tian, 2000;Yarrow, 1988, 1991;Yarrow, 1986); scant attention has been given to implementation and the role of the employees' resistance in the successful implementation of privatization and restructuring initiatives. In this paper, we fill this lacuna by studying the effect of a conflict of interests between employees and the government (owners) on the successful implementation of the government's privatization (owners' restructuring) plans, which ultimately determines the cost of the process and the extent of successful implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%