The Science of Citizen Science 2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Recent Past and Possible Futures of Citizen Science: Final Remarks

Abstract: This book is the culmination of the COST Action CA15212 Citizen Science to Promote Creativity, Scientific Literacy, and Innovation throughout Europe. It represents the final stage of a shared journey taken over the last 4 years. During this relatively short period, our citizen science practices and perspectives have rapidly evolved. In this chapter we discuss what we have learnt about the recent past of citizen science and what we expect and hope for the future.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the research results presented in the articles of this Research Topic allow the formulation of five directions for further research. These are: 1) dynamics of peer learning and organizational culture in citizen science and social innovation projects; 2) the personal capacity of social entrepreneurs, public managers, citizen scientists, and researchers; 3) design, evaluation, communication, and dissemination of results of the citizen science and social innovation initiatives; 4) digital social innovation and citizen science; and 5) co-creation and co-production processes and their impact on stakeholders (see also Schäfer and Kieslinger 2016 ; Anderson et al, 2020 ; Perelló et al, 2021 ). The editors hope this collection will be an inspiring introduction to studying both identified and yet unnoticed relations between citizen science and social innovation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the research results presented in the articles of this Research Topic allow the formulation of five directions for further research. These are: 1) dynamics of peer learning and organizational culture in citizen science and social innovation projects; 2) the personal capacity of social entrepreneurs, public managers, citizen scientists, and researchers; 3) design, evaluation, communication, and dissemination of results of the citizen science and social innovation initiatives; 4) digital social innovation and citizen science; and 5) co-creation and co-production processes and their impact on stakeholders (see also Schäfer and Kieslinger 2016 ; Anderson et al, 2020 ; Perelló et al, 2021 ). The editors hope this collection will be an inspiring introduction to studying both identified and yet unnoticed relations between citizen science and social innovation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the MICS project developed a state-of-the-art tool for assessing impact in five areas: society, the environment, the economy, governance and science and technology (Wehn et al, 2021). In our review, 29% and 8% of the reported projects here were evaluated for their societal and policy impact, respectively, whilst there is a high demand for proof of societal and policy impact of citizen science practices in certain countries, for example, in Germany (Perell o et al, 2021). Those authors expected the demand to expand to other countries in the future.…”
Section: Citizen Science Projects' Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because CS is able to engage heterogeneous actors in knowledge production processes, it is potentially a way to fulfil the goal of the participatory approach within science communication: to engage in a participatory process [Wagenknecht et al, 2021;Magalhães et al, 2022]. Nonetheless, there are some potential dangers that must be considered: indeed, social inequalities can affect the recruitment of participants and thus deepen the gap between those who participate in CS project activities and those who do not [Dopico, Ardura, Borrell, Miralles & García-Vázquez, 2021;Perelló et al, 2021]. Similarly, CS projects' leaders may not be interested in actively engaging with non-scientists [Golumbic et al, 2017] and other limits of public engagement may apply also to CS [Riesch et al, 2013] As should be clear at this point, the communication strategies mentioned as part of CS activities may actively foster or hinder actual engagement of the participants, thereby shaping the outcomes of research through CS.…”
Section: Theoretical Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%