Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The recent change in the Italian policies for photovoltaics: Effects on the payback period and levelized cost of electricity of grid-connected photovoltaic systems installed in urban contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This range is lower than minimal value proposed in Table 2 concerning Italy (0.15 €/kWh) and is similar to one calculated for OECD countries (0.09 €/kWh). In according to existing literature, the reduction of PV investment costs has pushed this technology towards greater competitiveness [21,24]. A comparison with values of other technologies proposed in Table 2 confirms this evaluation. A useful tool is represented by the analysis of the distribution of discounted cash inflows (Table 8) and discounted cash outflows (Table 9).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This range is lower than minimal value proposed in Table 2 concerning Italy (0.15 €/kWh) and is similar to one calculated for OECD countries (0.09 €/kWh). In according to existing literature, the reduction of PV investment costs has pushed this technology towards greater competitiveness [21,24]. A comparison with values of other technologies proposed in Table 2 confirms this evaluation. A useful tool is represented by the analysis of the distribution of discounted cash inflows (Table 8) and discounted cash outflows (Table 9).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…A review on the various PV incentive systems has defined an average NPV equal to 9570 €/inhabitant under a feed-in premium tariff in 2012, 5906 €/inhabitant under an all-inclusive feed-in tariff in 2013, 2065 €/inhabitant under a 50% tax deduction in 2013 and 2380 €/inhabitant under both 50% tax deduction in 2014 with a reduction of investment costs [40]. Also, DPBT proposes interesting values with existing literature: 3-12 years [12], 4-8 years [41] and 7-15 years [21]. The case studies proposed in this work show that the profitability can reach very interesting values and consumers also play a key-role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The LCOE calculation method is internationally recognized as a benchmark for assessing the economic viability of different generation technologies as well as of individual projects and enables the comparison of different energy technologies with respect to their costs. [24][25][26][27][28] Besides, the LCOE method is able to reflect the key factors of the production cost throughout the lifetime of the power plant in just one number and it causes a great reduction in complexity and allows a quick and easy comparison of different alternatives. 29,30 According to Myhr et al, 31 from an economic point of view, the LCOE contains the most important factors contributing to the economic evaluation of a project.…”
Section: The Lcoe Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the unacceptable cost of replacing or repairing the broken equipment at that time, many PV systems were turn off after a few years. The producers also had no motivation to spend their resources to maintain their systems [81]. As a result, the installation of PV plants in Italy was unregulated until 2006.…”
Section: Pv Incentive Policies In Italymentioning
confidence: 99%