The Real-World Problem of Care Coordination: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study with Patients Living with Advanced Progressive Illness and Their Unpaid Caregivers

Abstract

ObjectivesTo develop a model of care coordination for patients living with advanced progressive illness and their unpaid caregivers, and to understand their perspective regarding care coordination.DesignA prospective longitudinal, multi-perspective qualitative study involving a case-study approach.MethodsSerial in-depth interviews were conducted, transcribed verbatim and then analyzed through open and axial coding in order to construct categories for three cases (sites). This was followed by continued thematic analysis to identify underlying conceptual coherence across all cases in order to produce one coherent care coordination model.ParticipantsFifty-six purposively sampled patients and 27 case-linked unpaid caregivers.SettingsThree cases from contrasting primary, secondary and tertiary settings within Britain.ResultsCoordination is a deliberate cross-cutting action that involves high-quality, caring and well-informed staff, patients and unpaid caregivers who must work in partnership together across health and social care settings. For coordination to occur, it must be adequately resourced with efficient systems and services that communicate. Patients and unpaid caregivers contribute substantially to the coordination of their care, which is sometimes volunteered at a personal cost to them. Coordination is facilitated through flexible and patient-centered care, characterized by accurate and timely information communicated in a way that considers patients’ and caregivers’ needs, preferences, circumstances and abilities.ConclusionsWithin the midst of advanced progressive illness, coordination is a shared and complex intervention involving relational, structural and information components. Our study is one of the first to extensively examine patients’ and caregivers’ views about coordination, thus aiding conceptual fidelity. These findings can be used to help avoid oversimplifying a real-world problem, such as care coordination. Avoiding oversimplification can help with the development, evaluation and implementation of real-world coordination interventions for patients and their unpaid caregivers in the future.

‘Falling through gaps’: primary care patients’ accounts of breakdowns in experienced continuity of care

“…[18][19][20] A known and trusted health professional, who accepts the patient's needs as legitimate, and is willing and able to act on their behalf, is, if obtainable, a valuable additional resource. Patients with complex conditions, who lack personal resources (whether capacity, money, or social support), and who do not have an ongoing relationship with a trusted health professional are likely to be particularly vulnerable to unresolved breakdowns in care.…”

The expanding role of primary care in cancer control

“…The elements of good integrated planning include adequate resourcing of all professionals, appropriate knowledge and skills, good communication between professionals, active engagement with patients and their carers, clarity on the contribution of each part of the health system, and eff ective management systems and decision-making capacity. 248 The fragmented nature of some health-care systems can make the engagement of primary care in the management of patients with advanced cancer an operational challenge. However, the outcomes could be worth the eff ort.…”

Atenção integral à comunidade: autoavaliação das equipes de saúde da família

“…No que concerne aos itens analisados na subdimensão, o cuidado dos usuários com condições crônicas mostrou-se frágil, principalmente quanto à estratificação de risco e promoção da autonomia e do autocuidado. Também foram identificadas deficiências nesse cuidado em pesquisas no estado do Amazonas (23) e no Brasil (17), e em outros países: na província de Quebec, Canadá (24,25), em Leicestershire, Inglaterra (26), no Reino Unido (27) e na China (28).…”