Global Governance of Labour Rights 2015
DOI: 10.4337/9781784711467.00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rapprochement of ILO standards and CSR mechanisms: towards a positive understanding of the ‘privatization’ of international labour standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This risk of capture problematizes research portraying the privatization of fundamental labor rights into codes of conduct as an effective means of circumventing state legal institutions that are unwilling, or unable, to uphold laborers’ rights (Pekdemir et al . ; Zandvliet & van der Heijden ). It equally raises red flags for other transpositive developments, such as the privatization, or “contractualization” of fundamental labor rights into novel, transnational framework agreements between transnational labor union federations and multinational corporations (Moreau ; Drouin ).…”
Section: Discussion: the Jurisgenerative Role Of Social Auditors In Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This risk of capture problematizes research portraying the privatization of fundamental labor rights into codes of conduct as an effective means of circumventing state legal institutions that are unwilling, or unable, to uphold laborers’ rights (Pekdemir et al . ; Zandvliet & van der Heijden ). It equally raises red flags for other transpositive developments, such as the privatization, or “contractualization” of fundamental labor rights into novel, transnational framework agreements between transnational labor union federations and multinational corporations (Moreau ; Drouin ).…”
Section: Discussion: the Jurisgenerative Role Of Social Auditors In Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, auditors enlisted by these rulemakers automatically acquire a second, and “non‐delegated,” intermediary role implementing and monitoring compliance with those referenced legal standards (Havinga & Verbruggen ; Marx & Wouters ). That is, they take upon themselves the role of implementing laws and thus serving as an intermediary for states and international organizations, such as the ILO, that have not requested their intermediary services (Zandvliet & van der Heijden ). In the course of this work, it is likely that auditors assist rulemakers in operationalizing international legal requirements into their private rules.…”
Section: Regulatory Intermediaries and The Emergence Of Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They each bring forth their own set of problems. In labour rights, the rapprochement of organisations and countries to labour standards through for instance various economic instruments can be considered a positive development (Zandvliet & van der Heijden, 2015). From a coherence point of view, various standards and policies are becoming normatively aligned as standards from both public and private actors allude to ILO standards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%