2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017gl073322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rapid yet uneven turnover of Earth's groundwater

Abstract: The turnover of groundwater through recharge drives many processes throughout Earth's surface and subsurface. Yet groundwater turnover rates and their relationship to regional climate and geology remain largely unknown. We estimated that over 200 × 106 km3 of groundwater has recharged since the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), which is 10 times the volume of global groundwater storage. However, flushing is very unevenly distributed throughout Earth's one million watersheds, with some aquifers turned over thousands … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this potential underestimate, the 1.4 m estimate of global groundwater potential storage at the LGM most likely represents an upper bound and should be regarded as a maximum contribution for a number of other reasons. First, many areas appear to have experienced lower groundwater levels or recharge rates during the LGM not higher ones needed to sequester more groundwater at the LGM (Ferrera et al, 1999;Otto-Biesner et al, 2006;Befus et al, 2017). In addition, falling sea levels prior to the LGM exposed the shelf and likely drained now-submerged (and filled) aquifers during the LGM (Faure et al, 2002) resulting in lower groundwater storage.…”
Section: Groundwater Changes Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite this potential underestimate, the 1.4 m estimate of global groundwater potential storage at the LGM most likely represents an upper bound and should be regarded as a maximum contribution for a number of other reasons. First, many areas appear to have experienced lower groundwater levels or recharge rates during the LGM not higher ones needed to sequester more groundwater at the LGM (Ferrera et al, 1999;Otto-Biesner et al, 2006;Befus et al, 2017). In addition, falling sea levels prior to the LGM exposed the shelf and likely drained now-submerged (and filled) aquifers during the LGM (Faure et al, 2002) resulting in lower groundwater storage.…”
Section: Groundwater Changes Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This volume of water is enough to raise sea levels by~63 m assuming a global ocean area of 3.619 Â 10 8 km 2 (Eakins and Sharman, 2010). A significant amount of that groundwater is known to be circulating within the hydrologic cycle with an estimated 210.5e837.6 million km 3 of water recharged since the LGM, although roughly a third of the current groundwater reservoirs are relicts from the LGM (Befus et al, 2017). Estimating the volume of groundwater at the LGM is a difficult task and direct measures of the groundwater table during the LGM are sparse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with observations of larger than expected groundwater gradients, given the current low recharge, that have been observed in present day arid zones 25 . While groundwater residence time and groundwater response time are fundamentally different concepts, we also note the correspondence between high GRT and significant volumes of fossil-aged groundwater storage in arid regions 2,26 . The outcome of this result is that groundwater discharge to oases, rivers or wetlands in otherwise dry landscapes will be particularly intransient in comparison to climate change, in as much as climate controls the variations in groundwater recharge.…”
Section: Textmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These characteristics can be applied to anticipate the groundwater response to present conditions and to future pressures that can be expected from anthropogenic climate change (Taylor et al, 2013a). The results from the analysis of GRACE data are reconciled to regionalscale hydrogeological conditions, which gives confidence in their validity (Beven and Germann, 2013) albeit with the caveat regarding the uncertainties inherent in all the datasets used (Wilks, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%