1981
DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(81)90127-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rapid-smoking technique: Therapeutic effectiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To maximize impact, we clustered the sessions and made the required amount of smoking per session greater than that of previous rapid smoking protocols. Prior studies showing the effectiveness of rapid smoking as an initial cessation strategy often involved a larger number of sessions spaced over a longer time frame with fewer trials per session (Best, Owen, & Trentadue, 1978; Lichtenstein et al, 1973; Norton & Barske, 1977; Poole, Sanson-Fisher, & German, 1981; Schmahl, Lichtenstein, & Harris, 1972). Thus, it is possible that other variations of the protocol or additional sessions based on individual needs may have been more effective (see Danaher, 1977).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To maximize impact, we clustered the sessions and made the required amount of smoking per session greater than that of previous rapid smoking protocols. Prior studies showing the effectiveness of rapid smoking as an initial cessation strategy often involved a larger number of sessions spaced over a longer time frame with fewer trials per session (Best, Owen, & Trentadue, 1978; Lichtenstein et al, 1973; Norton & Barske, 1977; Poole, Sanson-Fisher, & German, 1981; Schmahl, Lichtenstein, & Harris, 1972). Thus, it is possible that other variations of the protocol or additional sessions based on individual needs may have been more effective (see Danaher, 1977).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to decay rapidly (i.e. rapid smoking, Poole, Sanson-Fisher, and German, 1981). In some cases, strategies intended to enhance maintenance have yielded poorer outcome {Relinger, Bornstein, Carmody & Zohn, 1977).…”
Section: Smoking Cessation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although outcome studies of rapid smoking have not matched the successful abstinence rates of the original work (Lichtenstein, Harris, Birchler, Wahl, & Schmahl, 1973;Schmahl, Lichtenstein, & Harris, 1972), departure from the original method may be the cause (Danaher, 1977). Studies of the rapid smoking method since 1973 have invariably restricted or controlled the number of sessions (Best, Owen, & Trentadue, 1978;Elliott & Denney, 1978;Glasgow, 1978;Lando, 1975;Norton & Barske, 1977;Poole, Sanson-Fisher, & German, 1981;Raw & Russell, 1980;Relinger, Bornstein, Bugge, Carmody, & Zohn, 1977), conducted treatment in groups (Barkley, Hastings, & Jackson, 1977;Lando, 1975;Norton & Barske, 1977;Poole et al, 1981;Raw & Russell, 1980;Relinger et al, 1977), added additional components and/or booster sessions (Danaher, 1977;Elliott & Denney, 1978;Poole etal., 1981;Relinger etal., 1977), or had clients rapid smoke at home (Best et al, 1978;Danaher, Jeffery, Zimmerman, & Nelson, 1980). Our work, which replicated the (a) single client, (b) warm client-therapist relationship, (c) positive expectations of success, (d) individualized treatment scheduling, (e) office-based treatment, and (f) the admonition that the client was not to smoke between rapid smoking sessions, achieved levels of abstinence (60% at 6 months) comparable to Lichtenstein and colleagues .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%