“…Although outcome studies of rapid smoking have not matched the successful abstinence rates of the original work (Lichtenstein, Harris, Birchler, Wahl, & Schmahl, 1973;Schmahl, Lichtenstein, & Harris, 1972), departure from the original method may be the cause (Danaher, 1977). Studies of the rapid smoking method since 1973 have invariably restricted or controlled the number of sessions (Best, Owen, & Trentadue, 1978;Elliott & Denney, 1978;Glasgow, 1978;Lando, 1975;Norton & Barske, 1977;Poole, Sanson-Fisher, & German, 1981;Raw & Russell, 1980;Relinger, Bornstein, Bugge, Carmody, & Zohn, 1977), conducted treatment in groups (Barkley, Hastings, & Jackson, 1977;Lando, 1975;Norton & Barske, 1977;Poole et al, 1981;Raw & Russell, 1980;Relinger et al, 1977), added additional components and/or booster sessions (Danaher, 1977;Elliott & Denney, 1978;Poole etal., 1981;Relinger etal., 1977), or had clients rapid smoke at home (Best et al, 1978;Danaher, Jeffery, Zimmerman, & Nelson, 1980). Our work, which replicated the (a) single client, (b) warm client-therapist relationship, (c) positive expectations of success, (d) individualized treatment scheduling, (e) office-based treatment, and (f) the admonition that the client was not to smoke between rapid smoking sessions, achieved levels of abstinence (60% at 6 months) comparable to Lichtenstein and colleagues .…”