2018
DOI: 10.1177/1532673x18810012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Racial Implications of Voter Identification Laws in America

Abstract: Over 40 states have considered voter identification laws in recent years, with several adopting laws requiring voters to show a valid ID before they cast a ballot. We argue that such laws have a disenfranchising affect on racial and ethnic minorities, who are less likely than Whites to possess a valid ID. Leveraging a unique national dataset, we offer a comprehensive portrait of who does and does not have access to a valid piece of voter identification. We find clear evidence that people of color are less like… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 1. It is worth mentioning that the literature surrounding the effects of voter IDs has not reached a consensus. Although many scholars find that voter IDs hurt voter turnout, especially that of minorities (Barreto et al, 2009, 2019; Hajnal et al, 2017, 2018), others find that requiring identification to vote has little to no effect (Grimmer et al, 2018; Highton, 2017; Mycoff et al, 2009; Rocha & Matsubayashi, 2014), with the differences in findings usually being attributed to flawed research designs (Burden, 2018; Erikson & Minnite, 2009). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1. It is worth mentioning that the literature surrounding the effects of voter IDs has not reached a consensus. Although many scholars find that voter IDs hurt voter turnout, especially that of minorities (Barreto et al, 2009, 2019; Hajnal et al, 2017, 2018), others find that requiring identification to vote has little to no effect (Grimmer et al, 2018; Highton, 2017; Mycoff et al, 2009; Rocha & Matsubayashi, 2014), with the differences in findings usually being attributed to flawed research designs (Burden, 2018; Erikson & Minnite, 2009). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Someone who reneges would have voted were it not for an obstacle that presented itself. National and single-state studies have shown that racial and ethnic minority voters are less likely to possess acceptable forms of voter identification than white voters (Barreto et al 2019;Hobby et al 2015). If so, strict photo ID laws could have a disparate impact on precinct level procedures in the polling place.…”
Section: Policies and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We coded the emails responses for two issues that seem related to discrimination—whether the respondent mentioned voter ID requirements or felon disqualification laws. If a respondent discriminates in their responses, then we would expect them to be more likely to bring up ID requirements or felon disqualification laws when responding to a Black constituent, because these issues disproportionally affect Black voters (Barreto et al, 2018; Biggers & Hanmer, 2017; Cottrell et al, 2019). We cannot infer whether this form of discrimination is malicious or well-meaning.…”
Section: Responding To Constituent Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%