“…Concurrency. Where selective mixing relates to connectivity of subpopulations and disease transmission between subpopulations, concurrency relates to connectivity of individuals and disease spread between individuals, and a number of studies have claimed that concurrency is important in explaining disparities in STI prevalence and the speed with which STIs propagate through a population [Watts and May (1992), Hudson (1993), Morris and Kretzschmar (1995, Kretzschmar and Morris (1996), Ghani, Swinton and Garnett (1997), Chick, Adams and Koopman (2000), Ghani and Garnett (2000), Koopman et al (2000), Schoenbach (2002, 2005), Doherty (2006, 2007), Doherty et al (2006), Morris, Goodreau and Moody (2007), Morris et al (2009), Johnson et al (2009), Mah and Halperin (2010, Eaton, Hallett and Garnett (2011), Goodreau (2011), Goodreau et al (2012, Kretzschmar and Caraël (2012), Hamilton and Morris (2015)]. If we consider a population under serial monogamy, current relationships must end before infected individuals place other noninfected individuals at risk.…”