2012
DOI: 10.1080/03601277.2010.544601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Quality of Life of Retired Reengaged Academics in Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wu et al (2013) validated its structure in the New Zealand Longitudinal Study of Ageing (NZLSA) where it was included the CASP-12 version in the first data collection wave. The scale was also used in Nigeria (Ejechi, 2012). In 2010, Amit and Litwin (2010) used data from SHARE-Israel to study differences in QoL amongst immigrants in Israel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al (2013) validated its structure in the New Zealand Longitudinal Study of Ageing (NZLSA) where it was included the CASP-12 version in the first data collection wave. The scale was also used in Nigeria (Ejechi, 2012). In 2010, Amit and Litwin (2010) used data from SHARE-Israel to study differences in QoL amongst immigrants in Israel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from study of QoL amongst retired Nigerian academics show that the scale performed relatively well. The scale as a whole displayed reasonable internal consistency and good convergent validity with life satisfaction scales [42]. Conversely the scale was dropped from first wave of the Japanese Study of Ageing and Retirement (J-STAR) because it was felt that the some of the domains of control and autonomy were too Western and not applicable to Japanese notions of QoL [43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the studies [45,46] specifically studied slum settings. Of the 22 studies, one study specified that the instrument used was not suitable for illiterate people [24]. Another study did not report on the literacy of its participants [25].…”
Section: Participants and Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%