2016
DOI: 10.4149/neo_2016_511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The quality of life following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation – a multicenter retrospective study

Abstract: Between January 2011 and December 2012, five hundred and ninety patients (pts) from 6 transplant centers in the Czech Republic filled in the questionnaire for the quantitative measurement of QOL using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) version 4. Study cohort characteristics were as follows: 325 males, 340 pts received myeloablative conditioning, 383 pts received PBPC, representation of diagnoses; acute leukemia (n=270), bone marrow failure (n=36), chronic myeloid leukemia (n=74), myelody… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality of life (QoL) of patients treated with HSCT has been explored in several previous studies [ 6 , 20 - 22 ] mainly showing that QoL deteriorates immediately after HSCT and stabilises or improves after three months [ 21 - 24 ]. Emotional well-being is usually most impaired before and immediately after HSCT, but improves over [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of life (QoL) of patients treated with HSCT has been explored in several previous studies [ 6 , 20 - 22 ] mainly showing that QoL deteriorates immediately after HSCT and stabilises or improves after three months [ 21 - 24 ]. Emotional well-being is usually most impaired before and immediately after HSCT, but improves over [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complications as well as physical and mental problems after HSCT are common and have a great influence on the life of the patients. [28][29][30] During the risk-benefit analysis phase the recipients face uncertainty because they know very little about HSCT. They therefore try to grasp the situation and learn as much as possible to make an informed decision to undergo transplantation.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes, the problem may centre on different ideas about an acceptable quality of life that often come into play in the decision-making process. The physical and psychological burdens experienced by patients undergoing HSCT are well known [80] and may have short- and long-term quality of life (QOL) consequences, further exacerbating the morbidity of HSCT [8183]. HSCT has a profound and pervasive impact on the lives of survivors [84]; in a cohort of five hundred and ninety patients from six transplant centres, Valkova et al recently demonstrated that patients with a GVHD had an inferior QOL score and that QOL decreased with increasing age and increased with time elapsed since HSCT.…”
Section: Bioethical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HSCT has a profound and pervasive impact on the lives of survivors [84]; in a cohort of five hundred and ninety patients from six transplant centres, Valkova et al recently demonstrated that patients with a GVHD had an inferior QOL score and that QOL decreased with increasing age and increased with time elapsed since HSCT. Despite the fact that QOL increases steadily as more time elapses since HSCT, sometimes, the impact of the consequences of HSCT may persist permanently, thus being a substantial factor in the decision-making process by patients [83]. …”
Section: Bioethical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%