2018
DOI: 10.1017/s0963180117000615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Quality Adjusted Life Year: A Total-Utility Perspective

Abstract: Given that a properly formed utilitarian response to healthcare distribution issues should evaluate cost effectiveness against the total utility increase, it follows that any utilitarian cost-effectiveness metric should be sensitive to increases in both individual and social utility afforded by a given intervention. Quality adjusted life year (QALY) based decisionmaking in healthcare cannot track increases in social utility, and as a result, the QALY cannot be considered a strict utilitarian response to issues… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A cost/QALY threshold of $50,000 is frequently cited in the literature, although Neumann et al have argued that this is too low of a threshold in the United States, with $100,000 or $150,000 as more reasonable estimates. 36 , 44 From a DR and DME treatment perspective, the program met Neumann et al’s cost/QALY threshold of $100,000, while the $50,000 threshold was met when treatment for non-retinal disease was included. 44 While Maberley et al’s study had one fourth the cost/QALY as compared to our study, they had a greater proportion of patients treated and half the screening cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A cost/QALY threshold of $50,000 is frequently cited in the literature, although Neumann et al have argued that this is too low of a threshold in the United States, with $100,000 or $150,000 as more reasonable estimates. 36 , 44 From a DR and DME treatment perspective, the program met Neumann et al’s cost/QALY threshold of $100,000, while the $50,000 threshold was met when treatment for non-retinal disease was included. 44 While Maberley et al’s study had one fourth the cost/QALY as compared to our study, they had a greater proportion of patients treated and half the screening cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach was to calculate the number of Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) saved. 36 The incremental QALYs saved by treatments were obtained from the literature in order to standardize the results and avoid potential bias from non-ophthalmologic comorbidities. The QALYs saved are shown in Table 1 with corresponding references in parentheses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study did not detect cost-effectiveness using the traditional methods with cost/clinical outcomes or cost/ quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), because different individuals have different subjective values for health benefits. 28 For skin conditions with the rare risk of disability or death, WTP can reflect the preferences and disease burden in a monetary manner, which may be more accurate and direct in detecting BCA compared with the traditional tools. In the past, there are a few studies that used WTP method to obtain the BCA for a specific treatment in the field of dermatology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, healthcare can be thought of as a sort of potential utility. 8 A welfare-funded sexual needs service would be akin to sports rehabilitation or femoral artery replacement in that they all respond to the decrease in a person’s quality of life as a function of a reduction in well-being.…”
Section: On Positive Sexual Rightsmentioning
confidence: 99%