1984
DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(84)90344-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pyrogallol assay for superoxide dismutase: Absence of a glutathione artifact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SOD assay. SOD activity was monitored according to a published method (Roth & Gilbert, 1984). One millilitre of reaction mixture contained 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 100 mM EDTA, 20 ml enzyme extract and 10 mM pyrogallol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SOD assay. SOD activity was monitored according to a published method (Roth & Gilbert, 1984). One millilitre of reaction mixture contained 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 100 mM EDTA, 20 ml enzyme extract and 10 mM pyrogallol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dialysis eliminated redox components of low mol wt as ascorbic acid and glutathione, which are involved in nonenzymic detoxification of toxic oxygen species (12,21). These components are abundant in cells and interact with superoxide radicals (16,22). Therefore, they can interfere with assays for superoxide dismutase which rely on the participation of 2 as the chain propagating species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SOD activity was monitored according to the method from Roth & Gilbert (1984) and modified by Kumar et al (2009). One ml of reaction mixture contained 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 100 mM EDTA, 20 ml enzyme extract, and 10 mM pyrogallol.…”
Section: Superoxide Dismutase (Sod) Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%