2016
DOI: 10.3758/s13415-016-0412-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The push of social pain: Does rejection’s sting motivate subsequent social reconnection?

Abstract: Physical pain motivates the healing of somatic injuries, yet it remains unknown whether social pain serves a similarly reparative function toward social injuries. Given the substantial overlap between physical and social pain, we predicted that social pain would mediate the effect of rejection on greater motivation for social reconnection and affiliative behavior toward rejecters. In Study 1, the effect of rejection on an increased need to belong was mediated by reports of more intense social pain. In Study 2,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, our finding suggests that a unique type of embodied, tactile interaction between individuals is capable of modulating the subjective effects of social exclusion. These findings are consistent with research pointing to the role of touch in the formation of social bonds 26 , 27 , 50 , as well as the findings that social exclusion can motivate interpersonal reconnection 9 , 10 , including touch 33 . Our findings therefore extend prior research indicating that touch leads to seeking interpersonal connection and pro-social behaviour following social exclusion 33 , and suggest that particularly this type of dynamic slow touch, which is associated with neurophysiological specificity and conveys social support 38 , 25 , 43 , buffers ostracism-related effects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, our finding suggests that a unique type of embodied, tactile interaction between individuals is capable of modulating the subjective effects of social exclusion. These findings are consistent with research pointing to the role of touch in the formation of social bonds 26 , 27 , 50 , as well as the findings that social exclusion can motivate interpersonal reconnection 9 , 10 , including touch 33 . Our findings therefore extend prior research indicating that touch leads to seeking interpersonal connection and pro-social behaviour following social exclusion 33 , and suggest that particularly this type of dynamic slow touch, which is associated with neurophysiological specificity and conveys social support 38 , 25 , 43 , buffers ostracism-related effects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In this sense, ostracism may activate a threat detection system that is experienced as a ‘social pain’ to promote re-connection and social proximity and bonding 4 , 5 . Indeed, research suggests that social exclusion motivates individuals to seek interpersonal reconnection 9 , 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VLPFC activation during social rejection was inversely associated with trait mindfulness and this lower VLPFC activation mediated the link between mindfulness and social distress. These results indicate that mindful individuals’ reduced prefrontal recruitment may be effective in regulating social distress, which is consistent with the idea that while greater recruitment of the VLPFC to regulate negative experiences can be adaptive, this is not always the case ( Chester et al , 2016 ). Our findings fit this excessive inhibition framework that suggests over recruitment of prefrontal brain regions may not always be adaptive.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…suppresses pro-social behavior (Gunther Moor et al, 2012;Twenge, Baumeister, DeWall, Ciarocco, & Bartels, 2007;Twenge, Baumeister, Tice, & Stucke, 2001), potentially by reducing the ability to regulate one's emotions . Importantly, an increased dACC response to social exclusion is associated with increased affiliative behaviors towards the excluders (Chester, DeWall, & Pond, 2016), and decreased aggression in individuals who show high executive functioning . In order to remain well liked by their peers, accepted adolescents' ability to regulate their emotions and behavior following exclusion may therefore be of key importance.…”
Section: Effects Of Participants' Peer Statusmentioning
confidence: 96%