The Public Health Innovation Model: Merging Private Sector Processes with Public Health Strengths

Abstract

Public health enjoyed a number of successes over the twentieth century. However, public health agencies have arguably been ill equipped to sustain these successes and address the complex threats we face today, including morbidity and mortality associated with persistent chronic diseases and emerging infectious diseases, in the context of flat funding and new and changing health care legislation. Transformational leaders, who are not afraid of taking risks to develop innovative approaches to combat present-day threats, are needed within public health agencies. We propose the Public Health Innovation Model (PHIM) as a tool for public health leaders who wish to integrate innovation into public health practice. This model merges traditional public health program planning models with innovation principles adapted from the private sector, including design thinking, seeking funding from private sector entities, and more strongly emphasizing program outcomes. We also discuss principles that leaders should consider adopting when transitioning to the PHIM, including cross-collaboration, community buy-in, human-centered assessment, autonomy and creativity, rapid experimentation and prototyping, and accountability to outcomes.

Prototyping for public health in a local context: a streamlined evaluation of a community-based weight management programme (Momenta), Northumberland, UK

“…The need for innovation within public health has been postulated, shifting away from the traditional linear preconceived and evidence-based model 20. For example, Parry and colleagues21 call for research to explore not only how a programme works, but also the context and requirements for any adaptations.…”

Improving the reporting of health research involving design: a proposed guideline

“…Design for global health may involve design thinking,4 human-centred design,5 service design and codesign. And the use of design for global health has especially been promoted in relation to the concept of social innovation 6 7…”

User-driven innovation and technology-use in public health and social care: A systematic review of existing evidence

“…Most countries, for example, experience substantial demographic changes and the resultant projected increase in need of eldercare combined with a concurrent decline in the number of professional careers (Couture et al, 2016;Huber et al, 2017). Also, health agencies today have to address the sophisticated threats, including morbidity and mortality associated with chronic, infectious and lifestyle diseases, in the context of flat or constrained funding and new and changing healthcare legislation (Lister et al, 2017;Tursunbayeva et al, 2017). Nevertheless, due to the high tax level, citizens urge to receive public services shaped for their needs and of the best quality (Granier and Kudo, 2016).…”