A Model for Personality 1981
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-67783-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Psychophysiology of Extraversion and Neuroticism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This state of affairs continued to hold when several more studies were subsequently reviewed (O'Gorman, 1983). Both O'Gorman (1977) and Stelmack (1981) offered a variety of criticisms of those studies reporting null findings, most notably the use of low intensity stimuli in the assessment of specific lability. Nevertheless, the accumulated findings suggest a weak inverse relationship between EDR lability and extraversion.…”
Section: Personality Correlatesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This state of affairs continued to hold when several more studies were subsequently reviewed (O'Gorman, 1983). Both O'Gorman (1977) and Stelmack (1981) offered a variety of criticisms of those studies reporting null findings, most notably the use of low intensity stimuli in the assessment of specific lability. Nevertheless, the accumulated findings suggest a weak inverse relationship between EDR lability and extraversion.…”
Section: Personality Correlatesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Stelmack (1981), reviewing literature on N, indicated that the relation between neuroticism and psychophysiological responsiveness has not been reported with sufficient consistency to prove H. J. Eysenck's prediction on the biological determinants of N trait. However, postulated that neuroticism is related to individual differences in excitability and emotional responsiveness.…”
Section: Individual Differences In the Arousal Statementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Both studies of electrodermal orienting reactions and of conditioning tend to find the predicted differences between extraverts and introverts only under low to moderately arousing conditions (Levey & Martin, 1981;Stelmack, 1981). These findings have been linked to the main hypothesis by the added assumption that introverts are pushed beyond an optimum point by stressful conditions, resulting in decrements of performance and responsivity (Eysenck, 1967(Eysenck, , 1983.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%