The psychometric properties of the Finnish Young Schema Questionnaire in chronic pain patients and a non-clinical sample

Saariaho, Tom; Saariaho, Anita; Karila, Irma; Joukamaa, Matti

doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2008.07.005

Cited by 66 publications

(80 citation statements)

References 26 publications

(31 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The results show that even children of around 8 to 13 years of age exhibit the same schemas as were identified for adults. At present, several studies support the 18-factor structure, in factor analyses of schema questionnaires in adults (Calvete, Orue, & Gonzalez-Diez, 2013;Hawke & Provencher, 2012;Kriston et al, 2013;Lee et al, 2015;Saariaho et al, 2009). In contrast to most other schema questionnaires for children and adolescents, in which only 15 schemas were investigated, we also confirmed 18 schemas for children.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

“…To sum up, Young's original 18 schemas were replicated with factor analyses for adults in various studies (Calvete, Orue, & Gonzalez-Diez, 2013;Hawke & Provencher, 2012;Kriston et al, 2013;Lee et al, 2015;Saariaho et al, 2009), and studies with adolescents have shown comparable results (Lumley & Harkness, 2007;Muris, 2006;Van Vlierberghe & Braet, 2007). In studies with children, many schemas (i.e., 12 from 15; Stallard & Rayner, 2005) and 11 (composed) of 15 schemas (Rijkeboer & de Boo, 2010) were also confirmed by factorial analyses.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 90%

“…Although the factorial structure of the YSQ may differ slightly from study to study, between 12 and 15 EMS have been identified by factor analysis for the questionnaires that included 15 to 16 EMS (Lee, Taylor, & Dunn, 1999;Rijkeboer & van den Bergh, 2006;Stopa, Thorne, Waters, & Preston, 2001;Waller, Meyer, & Ohanian, 2001;Welburn, Coristine, Dagg, Pontefract, & Jordan, 2002). Nevertheless, when using the third version of the YSQ composed of 18 EMS (YSQ-S3R; Young, 2005aYoung, , 2005b, all of these 18 EMS were verified via factor analysis (Calvete, Orue, & Gonzalez-Diez, 2013;Hawke & Provencher, 2012;Kriston, Schäfer, Jacob, Härter, & Hölzel, 2013;Lee, Choi, Rim, Won, & Lee, 2015;Saariaho, Saariaho, Karila, & Joukamaa, 2009). In adolescents, EMSs have also been investigated with a shorter form of the YSQ (YSQ-sf; Young, 1998) or an adapted version of the YSQ for adolescents (YSQ-A; Van Vlierberghe et al, 2010).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Dusseldorf Illustrated Schema Questionnaire for Children (DISC)

Loose

Meyer

Pietrowsky

2018

Psicol. Refl. Crít.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Childhood experiences are considered to be of crucial importance in the formation of maladaptive schemas, according to Young's concept. Although some schema questionnaires already exist for children, these instruments differ in their schema structures with between 8 and 12 identified factors. To obtain a deeper understanding of early maladaptive schemas in childhood an instrument based on Young's 18-schema model was constructed (Dusseldorf Illustrated Schema Questionnaire for Children (DISC)). Cartoons were designed which represented each schema, providing children with a visual impression of what was meant by the schema, and thus the questions that they had to answer. The items were phrased as self-report statements and children's approval of the statements was assessed using a 4-point rating scale. The resulting preliminary questionnaire (18 cartoons, 90 items) was presented in classrooms across different school types (N = 569, between 8 and 13 years). A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed on this data to confirm the factorial structure of the questionnaire and to reduce the number of items to two items per schema. The DISC in its final version included 36 items and showed a sufficiently high test-retest reliability and convergent validity when assessed in comparison to another schema questionnaire for children. In addition, the present test is of predictive value since the DISC sum score correlated with ratings on the children's behavioral problems. CFA showed a satisfactory goodness-of-fit based on the original 18-factor model, providing a compact instrument to assess schema representations and to evaluate the dynamics of maladaptation during child development.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 90%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Dusseldorf Illustrated Schema Questionnaire for Children (DISC)

Loose

Meyer

Pietrowsky

2018

Psicol. Refl. Crít.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Plus d'une dizaine de publications à travers le monde [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] analysent les questionnaires des schémas, sans trouver de consensus quant au nombre de dimensions des questionnaires et leurs significations. L'objectif de nos analyses statistiques est d'identifier les dimensions cliniques qui expliquent le mieux les 18 SPI.…”

Section: Analyses Des Questionnaires Des Schémas De Young (Qsy)unclassified

Les 5 dimensions psychiques identifiées à partir des schémas précoces inadaptés : analyses statistiques du questionnaire des schémas (QSY-s3)

Lavergne

Marie

Mehran³

2015

L'Encéphale

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

These 5 domains do not completely fit Young's five "primary infantile needs" domains. Only 2/3 of the EMS are correctly attributed to the "primary infantile needs" domains. The 5 domains seem closely related to the 5 dimensions of the NEO-PI-R or to the 5 domains of personality disorders (criteria b) described in the DSM-5. In our understanding the dimensions "avoidance, give, take" represent 3 types of relationship to others (on behavioral level). The dimension "awareness" represents the fears and losses (on the emotional level) and "faith" represents beliefs and consciousness (on the cognitive level). The intensity of the 5 domains inside each class of patients could guide the clinical interpretation, specifically for personality disorders.

show abstract

“…A avaliação da estrutura fatorial do YSQ finlandês foi realizada por Saariaho et al 23 em amostras de pacientes com dor crônica e grupos controles com análise fatorial confirmató-ria. Nos resultados, os alfas individuais para as subescalas que avaliam os EID variaram entre α 0,94 e α 0,79 no grupo dos pacientes com dor e entre α 0,94 e α 0,81 no grupo controle.…”

unclassified

Avaliação dos esquemas iniciais desadaptativos: estudo psicométrico em alcoolistas

Silva

Cazassa

Oliveira

et al. 2012

J. bras. psiquiatr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

rESUMoObjetivo: Este estudo objetiva apresentar as propriedades psicométricas do Questionário de Esquemas de Young -forma reduzida (YSQ-S2). Método: Foi realizado um estudo quantitativo, transversal, comparando um grupo clínico de alcoolistas com um grupo não clínico. Os resultados foram analisados com o alfa de Cronbach, o teste t de Student e a Análise Discriminante. A amostra da pesquisa foi constituída por 107 sujeitos, sendo 51 alcoolistas e 56 de uma amostra populacional do grupo de não alcoolistas. Resultados: Foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significativas nas cinco áreas e nos 15 esquemas avaliados pelo questionário YSQ-S2 quando comparados os grupos clínico e não clínico. Conclusão: Foi observado que o YSQ-S2 é um instrumento capaz de detectar diferenças entre populações clínicas e não clínicas, sendo um importante recurso para uma avaliação mais profunda do funcionamento da personalidade do paciente. aBStraCtObjective: This study aims at presenting the psychometric properties of the Young Schema Questionnaire -short form (YSQ-S2). Method: We conducted a quantitative study, cross-sectional comparing a clinical with a non-clinical group and Cronbach's alpha, t test Student and Discriminant Analysis were used to analyze the results. The sample consisted of 107 subjects, 51 alcoholics and 56 non-alcoholics. Results: Statistically significant differences were found in the five areas and the 15 schemes assessed by the YSQ-S2 questionnaire when comparing the clinical and non-clinical groups. Conclusion: YSQ-S2 was found to be an instrument that can detect differences between clinical and non-clinical populations, its use being essential for a deeper assessment of the patient's personality.

show abstract

The psychometric properties of the Finnish Young Schema Questionnaire in chronic pain patients and a non-clinical sample

Cited by 66 publications

References 26 publications

The Dusseldorf Illustrated Schema Questionnaire for Children (DISC)

The Dusseldorf Illustrated Schema Questionnaire for Children (DISC)

Les 5 dimensions psychiques identifiées à partir des schémas précoces inadaptés : analyses statistiques du questionnaire des schémas (QSY-s3)

Avaliação dos esquemas iniciais desadaptativos: estudo psicométrico em alcoolistas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About