1994
DOI: 10.1177/0093854894021003006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Psychology of Criminal Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Study findings of personal factors demonstrated that experiencing early physical abuse, having substance use problems, and displaying anger problems were significantly associated with increased odds of engaging in repeated acts of workplace violence. These results are consistent with our hypothesis and with findings from studies examining the developmental and personal histories of violent individuals more broadly (Bartol & Bartol, 2014; Cornell et al, 1999; Fergusson et al, 2005; Gmel & Rehm, 2003; Lansford et al, 2007; Loeber & Hay, 1997; Moffitt, 1993; Parker & Auerhahn, 1998; Quinsey, Skilling, Lalumière, & Craig, 2004; Rossow, Pape, & Wichstrøm, 1999). Among all personal factors, anger was the only personal factor that emerged as a predictor of repeated workplace violence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Study findings of personal factors demonstrated that experiencing early physical abuse, having substance use problems, and displaying anger problems were significantly associated with increased odds of engaging in repeated acts of workplace violence. These results are consistent with our hypothesis and with findings from studies examining the developmental and personal histories of violent individuals more broadly (Bartol & Bartol, 2014; Cornell et al, 1999; Fergusson et al, 2005; Gmel & Rehm, 2003; Lansford et al, 2007; Loeber & Hay, 1997; Moffitt, 1993; Parker & Auerhahn, 1998; Quinsey, Skilling, Lalumière, & Craig, 2004; Rossow, Pape, & Wichstrøm, 1999). Among all personal factors, anger was the only personal factor that emerged as a predictor of repeated workplace violence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Concerning the time component, it is an issue that may cause some controversy. Researchers mostly state that ‘they range from days to weeks or months’ (Bartol, 1994; Geberth, 2006; Osborn & Salfati, 2015), others argue (Barnett et al, 1989) that they found, in relation to the intervals between crimes, classifying two types of offenders: the ‘frequent’ had a daily probability between 1 and 320 of committing a crime, while the ‘occasional’ had a 1 in 913 daily chance of committing a crime. Additionally, other studies have shown that frequent or high‐rate offenders tend to experience relatively short intervals of time before relapsing (Piquero et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the time component, it is an issue that may cause some controversy. Researchers mostly state that 'they range from days to weeks or months' (Bartol, 1994;Geberth, 2006;Osborn & Salfati, 2015), others argue (Barnett et al, 1989) that they found, in relation to the intervals between crimes, classifying two types of offenders:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, bomb threats in Japan were most frequently made against banks on a weekday, during the daytime. Bomb threats were mostly accompanied with actual bombings in the US and Finland (Bartol & Bartol, 2006;Häkkänen, 2006), whereas most offenders in Japan made a threat but did not actually plant a bomb. First, the circumstances differ among the countries; for example, in Japan, it is more diffi cult for offenders to get a bomb, therefore, there may be few actual bombings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%