2020
DOI: 10.3390/su13010066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Prut River under Climate Change and Hydropower Impact

Abstract: Climate change and intensive hydropower development pose serious challenges to the sustainable water supply of natural and social systems. This study’s purpose is to statistically estimate the complex influence of these factors on the Prut River flow. Its methodical approach is based on a comparative analysis of the flow in 1961–1990 and 1991–2018, reflecting the regional climate before and after an intensive global warming onset, and in 1950–1975 and 1980–2017, before and after the construction of the Stanca-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the Prut river, the comparative analysis of the flow on the Prut's riverbed in 1961-1990 and 1991-2018 -before and after global warming, and in 1950-1975 and 1980-2017, before and after the construction of the Costesti -Stanca hydropower plant (HPP) demonstrated no significant impact on the total water discharge downstream, but only the seasonal distribution of the river's streamflow [1]. Hydropower constructions on Dniester river have caused dramatic deteriorations at ecosystem level, Such changes are for example fragmentation of river continuity, deterioration of the self-purification capacity of the river [2][3], loss of ecosystem services [4], big fluctuation of the water flows and levels [5], alteration of temperature and oxygen regimes [6], bedrock structural changes and annual stock of suspended particles [7], the rate of mineralization and dynamics of the main ions [8], penetration and distribution of alien and parasitic species [9][10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the Prut river, the comparative analysis of the flow on the Prut's riverbed in 1961-1990 and 1991-2018 -before and after global warming, and in 1950-1975 and 1980-2017, before and after the construction of the Costesti -Stanca hydropower plant (HPP) demonstrated no significant impact on the total water discharge downstream, but only the seasonal distribution of the river's streamflow [1]. Hydropower constructions on Dniester river have caused dramatic deteriorations at ecosystem level, Such changes are for example fragmentation of river continuity, deterioration of the self-purification capacity of the river [2][3], loss of ecosystem services [4], big fluctuation of the water flows and levels [5], alteration of temperature and oxygen regimes [6], bedrock structural changes and annual stock of suspended particles [7], the rate of mineralization and dynamics of the main ions [8], penetration and distribution of alien and parasitic species [9][10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed methodology developed by International Association of River Keepers "Eco-Tiras" can be used at different scales -the catchment (basin) scale allow quantifying processes related to water cycle and for the implementation of monitoring plans, at the water body scale -specific functions of ecosystems, supporting certain services are analyzed. The methodological guide developed provide a theoretical description of the approach complemented by examples of evaluating the impact of hydropower and climate change in the context of Dniester River environment [1]. These estimations were based on the results of physical and biochemical parameters, identified in the framework of HydroEcoNex project.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%