1989
DOI: 10.1300/j052v08n01_04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Provision of Weekend Home Delivered Meals by State and a Pilot Study Indicating the Need for Weekend Home Delivered Meals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodological quality of the included studies was in general good with an average quality score of 0.81 (standard deviation: 0.13) ranging from 0.54 (24) to 1 (25-27) (Appendix 1). Overall, the control of confounding factors and the characterization of participants were poorly rated in the selected studies.…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodological quality of the included studies was in general good with an average quality score of 0.81 (standard deviation: 0.13) ranging from 0.54 (24) to 1 (25-27) (Appendix 1). Overall, the control of confounding factors and the characterization of participants were poorly rated in the selected studies.…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nearly half of the studies (n=39) represent a cross-sectional single point in time (18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56). Thirty-two of these cross-sectional studies report on a single sample (18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46), and with the exception of one national sample (32), the samples were drawn from areas smaller than or equivalent to individual US states.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty-two of these cross-sectional studies report on a single sample (18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46), and with the exception of one national sample (32), the samples were drawn from areas smaller than or equivalent to individual US states. Study designs varied and included face-to-face interviews, telephone surveys, mail surveys, and chart reviews.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of a meal on nutrient intake is more obvious from a study by Walden and coauthors 44 . Their results showed that, compared with nutrient intake on weekdays when clients received a daily meal, nutrient intakes on weekend days were more likely to contain insufficient protein, thiamin, riboflavin, calcium, iron, and phosphorus 44 .…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Hdm Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of a meal on nutrient intake is more obvious from a study by Walden and coauthors 44 . Their results showed that, compared with nutrient intake on weekdays when clients received a daily meal, nutrient intakes on weekend days were more likely to contain insufficient protein, thiamin, riboflavin, calcium, iron, and phosphorus 44 . Although there was no designated control group in this study, the authors stated that improvement of participants' intake on days when they received meals is indicative of the positive impact the program had on their nutrition status.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Hdm Programmentioning
confidence: 99%