Participation in home-delivered meals programs may contribute to the health and independence of older adults living in the community, especially those who are food insecure or those who are making transitions from acute, subacute, and chronic care settings to the home. The purpose of this study was to conduct a comprehensive and systematic review of ALL studies related to home-delivered meals in order to shed light on the state of the science. A complete review of articles appearing in PubMed using the Keyword “Meal” was conducted; and titles, abstracts, and full-texts were screened for relevance. Included in this review are 80 articles. Most studies are descriptive and do not report on outcomes. Frequently reported outcomes included nutritional status based upon self-reported dietary intake. Additionally, most studies included in this review are cross-sectional, have a small sample size, and/or are limited to a particular setting or participant population. More rigorous research is needed to: 1) gain insight into why so few eligible older adults access home-delivered meals programs, 2) support expansion of home-delivered meals to all eligible older adults, 3) better identify what home-delivered meals models alone and in combination with other services works best and for whom, and 4) better target home-delivered meals programs where and when resources are scarce.

Background After older adults experience episodes of poor health or are hospitalized, they may not return to pre-morbid eating behaviors. Furthermore, poor nutrition increases hospital readmission risk, but evidence-based interventions addressing these risks are limited. Objective The pilot study’s objective was to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial assessing a post-discharge home-delivered meals program’s impact on older adults’ nutritional intake and hospital readmissions and to assess patient acceptability and satisfaction with the program. The aims of the study were to 1) to evaluate successful recruitment, randomization, and retention of at least 80% of the 24 participants sought; 2) to compare the outcomes of hospital readmission and total daily caloric intake between participants in the intervention and control groups; and 3) to assess patient acceptability and satisfaction with the program. Design This study used a two-arm randomized controlled trial design, and baseline data were collected at enrollment; three 24-hour food recalls were collected during the intervention period; and health services utilization and intervention satisfaction was evaluated 45 days post-discharge. Participants/setting Twenty-four patients from the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Hospital’s Acute Care for Elders Unit were enrolled from May 2014 to June 2015. They were 65 or older, at risk of malnutrition, cognitively intact, able to communicate, discharged to a place where the patient or family was responsible for preparing meals, and diagnosed with congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia. Final analysis included 21 participants. Intervention The intervention group received 10 days of home-delivered meals and nutrition education; the control group received usual care and nutrition education. Main outcome measures The main outcome was intervention feasibility, measured by recruitment and retention goals. Hospital readmissions, caloric intake, and satisfaction with the intervention were also evaluated. Statistical analyses performed Univariate and bivariate parametric statistics were used to evaluate differences between groups. Goals for success were identified to assess feasibility of conducting a full-scale study, and outcomes were measured against the goals. Results 87.5% of randomized participants were retained for final data collection, indicating that this intervention study is feasible. There were no significant differences between groups for hospital readmissions; however, caloric intake during the intervention period was greater for intervention vs. control participants (1595 vs. 1235, p=.03). Participants were overwhelmingly satisfied (82–100% satisfied or very satisfied) with staff performance, meal quality, and delivery processes. Conclusions Conducting a randomized controlled trial to assess outcomes of providing home-delivered meals to older adults after hospital discharge in partnership w...