2006
DOI: 10.1021/pr060312m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Proteomic Reactor:  A Microfluidic Device for Processing Minute Amounts of Protein Prior to Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Abstract: Gel-free proteomics has emerged as a complement to conventional gel-based proteomics. Gel-free approaches focus on peptide or protein fractionation, but they do not address the efficiency of protein processing. We report the development of a microfluidic proteomic reactor that greatly simplifies the processing of complex proteomic samples by combining multiple proteomic steps. Rapid extraction and enrichment of proteins from complex proteomic samples or directly from cells are readily performed on the reactor.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
103
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The small sample and reagent requirements, rapid analysis times, high throughput processing capabilities, and low operating costs are among the driving forces for the development of these systems [5][6][7][8]. Different microfluidic devices have been applied to specific aspects of protein processing, in particular, protein purification and separation, protein digestion, and protein identification by mass spectrometry [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small sample and reagent requirements, rapid analysis times, high throughput processing capabilities, and low operating costs are among the driving forces for the development of these systems [5][6][7][8]. Different microfluidic devices have been applied to specific aspects of protein processing, in particular, protein purification and separation, protein digestion, and protein identification by mass spectrometry [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that the stability of immobilized proteases is superior to that of free proteases. A typical sample preparation for proteolysis before digestion involves multi-steps including denaturation, reduction of disulfide bond, and alkylation of free thiol group to reduce the conformational stability of protein; steps which are expected to produce enhancement of digestion efficiency (Ma et al, 2008;Li et al, 2007a;Ethier et al, 2006;Lin et al, 2008). However, the multi-step procedure is time-consuming.…”
Section: Proteolysis By the Protease-immobilized Microreactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the serial (unidirectional) nature of channel microfluidics has limited such systems to a single step (with some exceptions noted 47 ). Implementation of multistep reactions with different incubation periods and changes in pH may be challenging for enclosed microchannels.…”
Section: Proteomic Reactions In Channel Microfluidicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, this challenge is typical in proteomics; for example, in shotgun proteomics, samples are subjected to a multiday, multistep procedure including acidification, denaturing, reduction, alkylation, enzymatic digestion (twice), purification, and dilution prior to analysis by separations and mass spectrometry. 13 We acknowledge that microvalves 48 may offer some relief from this problem, but we submit that in general, microchannels are ill-suited for implementing the complicated series of reactions necessary for many proteomic applications (with some exceptions noted 47 Because each droplet is isolated from its surroundings rather than being embedded in a stream of fluid, DMF is a facile method for forming microreactors in which there is no possibility that reagents or samples will diffuse away. Most importantly, because each droplet is controlled individually, multistep methods involving many different reagents can be easily programmed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%