2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2008.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an automated digestion and droplet deposition microfluidic chip for MALDI-TOF MS

Abstract: An automated proteolytic digestion bioreactor and droplet deposition system was constructed with a plastic microfluidic device for off-line interfacing to matrix assisted laser desorption/ ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). The microfluidic chips were fabricated in poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), using a micromilling machine and incorporated a bioreactor, which was 100 ILm wide, 100 ILm deep, and possessed a 4 cm effective channel length (400 nL volume). The chip was operated by pres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the sequence coverage by the performed in-solution digestion (15 h at 301C) was 8% (45/607 amino acids). Lower sequence coverage was obtained for BSA, which was likely due to its stabilized tertiary structure by disulfide bonds [8,25]. The identification result by the trypsin-microreactor (5 min digestion) is even better than that by in-solution digestion that required a reaction time of 15 h.…”
Section: Protein Digestion By the Protease-immobilized Microreactormentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, the sequence coverage by the performed in-solution digestion (15 h at 301C) was 8% (45/607 amino acids). Lower sequence coverage was obtained for BSA, which was likely due to its stabilized tertiary structure by disulfide bonds [8,25]. The identification result by the trypsin-microreactor (5 min digestion) is even better than that by in-solution digestion that required a reaction time of 15 h.…”
Section: Protein Digestion By the Protease-immobilized Microreactormentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, several enzyme-immobilized microreactors have been developed. Reported results have demonstrated that the feasibility of protein digestion using protease-immobilized on various solid supports, for example, porous monoliths [6,7], PMMA [8], glass [9], magnetic nanoparticles [10,11], and PDMS [12]. We have also developed enzyme-immobilization techniques for surface modification of microchannels and their applica- tions for the preparation of efficient enzyme microreactors [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High sequence coverage is important to enhance the probability of identification of the protein and increase the likelihood of detection of structural variants generated by processes such as posttranslational modifications. Several methods for protease immobilization have been reported, wherein the protease, usually trypsin, has been immobilized in microchips by sol-gel encapsulation (Sakai-Kato et al, 2003;Wu et al, 2004), covalently bounded (Lee et al, 2008;Fan & Chen, 2007) and physically adsorbed onto different supports . In addition, trypsinimmobilized magnetic particles have been developted to carry out proteolysis with a short digestion time (Li et al, 2007a;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many inventive channel-based proteomic systems in which enzymes are immobilized in a section of the channel, such that the proteomic samples can be driven (electrokinetically or hydrodynamically) to the digestion site. 37,[171][172][173] Although such formats have favourable reaction kinetics because of the high surface-area-to-volume ratio and enzymeto-substrate ratio, such systems have typically been limited to single step processes, namely digestion. We are aware of two channel-based systems capable of carrying out a series of steps, including reduction, alkylation and digestion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%