2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48974-2_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Protection of Cultural Heritage Sites from Geo-Hazards: The PROTHEGO Project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Europe, the European Space Agency (ESA) and the European Union (EU) have supported a large range of projects that have demonstrated the feasibility of space technologies to monitor geohazards across the continent, although primarily those affecting cities. Examples of such projects include ESA-Terrafirma (2003 -2012) (Adam et al, 2009), EU-FP7-Subcoast (2010 -2013) (Gruijters & van der Krogt, 2013), EU-FP7-PanGeo (2011 -2014) (Capes, 2012) and EU-FP7-PROTHEGO (2015 -2018) (Themistocleous et al, 2016). Satellite-based interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) has played a central role in all of these projects as it is capable of measuring and monitoring a wide range of geohazards including landslides (Bayer et al, 2017), tectonics (Colesanti et al, 2003) and volcanology (Hooper et al, 2004), in addition to ground motion associated with anthropogenic activity such as oil and gas operations (Castelletto et al, 2013), carbon capture and storage (Rohmer et al, 2015), mining (Gee et al, 2017), civil engineering works (Marshall et al, 2018) and groundwater abstraction (Boni et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Europe, the European Space Agency (ESA) and the European Union (EU) have supported a large range of projects that have demonstrated the feasibility of space technologies to monitor geohazards across the continent, although primarily those affecting cities. Examples of such projects include ESA-Terrafirma (2003 -2012) (Adam et al, 2009), EU-FP7-Subcoast (2010 -2013) (Gruijters & van der Krogt, 2013), EU-FP7-PanGeo (2011 -2014) (Capes, 2012) and EU-FP7-PROTHEGO (2015 -2018) (Themistocleous et al, 2016). Satellite-based interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) has played a central role in all of these projects as it is capable of measuring and monitoring a wide range of geohazards including landslides (Bayer et al, 2017), tectonics (Colesanti et al, 2003) and volcanology (Hooper et al, 2004), in addition to ground motion associated with anthropogenic activity such as oil and gas operations (Castelletto et al, 2013), carbon capture and storage (Rohmer et al, 2015), mining (Gee et al, 2017), civil engineering works (Marshall et al, 2018) and groundwater abstraction (Boni et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other side, since the date should be used by stakeholders, very often not familiar with advanced technology, there is a need to develop specific end-user interfaces, allowing data visualization and some analysis, without affecting the internal consistency of the information. A clear example of this is the EU project PROTHEGO [80] and other case studies [81], where advanced ground deformation data obtained from satellite imaging can be provided to end-user for the interpretation of geological phenomena.…”
Section: Contribution Of Rs Techniques For Detection Of Criticalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decade, studies have demonstrated the power of InSAR as a tool for the deformation monitoring of cultural heritage structures, which can complement traditional geodetic measurements [21][22][23][24][25]. Since the topography phase and deformation phase are mixed in the InSAR signal [26], it is necessary to introduce external digital elevation models (DEM) in the differential operation of InSAR to mitigate the topography-related phase [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%