The Pros and Cons of Using Personal Response Systems in an Interactive Scientific Debate

Abstract

Aims: To assess the suitability of personal response system (PRS) clickers as an audience engagement tool to make conference debates a more interactive learning experience. Study Design: We studied the suitability of PRS to moderate and compile data on a scientific debate that was the centerpiece of an international conference. The debate explored the issues pertaining to the introduction of Genetically-Modified (GM) foods into Europe and involved a panel of some of the world's leading scientific authorities on this subject. Methodology: 173 delegates were issued with PRS handsets and audience demography was collected immediately prior to debate commencement. The audience was polled on their opinion on the debate motion during the event and PRS was used to instantly screen poll results and changes in inter-poll opinions to the audience. Results: (i) Pros: PRS effectively controlled debate timings, rendered the event interactive stimulating audience engagement, compiled the respondents' opinions on GM foods and instantly