1983
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(83)90171-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The propagation of motor unit action potential and the location of neuromuscular junction investigated by surface electrode arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean (MNF) or median (MDF) frequency of the PSD was shown to shift to lower frequencies during increasing fatigue (De Luca 1979;Lindstrom and Magnusson 1977;Viitasalo and Komi 1977;Merletti et al 1990;Merletti and Lo Conte 1997). MNF and MDF decrease has been largely attributed to the diminished muscular fibre conduction velocity (MFCV) as a consequence of local metabolic changes in the working muscle (Bigland-Ritchie 1981;Masuda et al 1983). However, the modifications of the motor unit (MU) action potential shape, MU firing rate and synchronisation of MUs may contribute to MNF and MDF changes as well (Brody et al 1991;Bigland-Ritchie and Woods 1984;Dimitrova and Dimitrov 2003;Gabriel and Kamen 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The mean (MNF) or median (MDF) frequency of the PSD was shown to shift to lower frequencies during increasing fatigue (De Luca 1979;Lindstrom and Magnusson 1977;Viitasalo and Komi 1977;Merletti et al 1990;Merletti and Lo Conte 1997). MNF and MDF decrease has been largely attributed to the diminished muscular fibre conduction velocity (MFCV) as a consequence of local metabolic changes in the working muscle (Bigland-Ritchie 1981;Masuda et al 1983). However, the modifications of the motor unit (MU) action potential shape, MU firing rate and synchronisation of MUs may contribute to MNF and MDF changes as well (Brody et al 1991;Bigland-Ritchie and Woods 1984;Dimitrova and Dimitrov 2003;Gabriel and Kamen 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Commonly used multi-electrode arrays consist of several (up to 120) pinelectrodes arranged two-dimensionally with interelectrode distances in the millimetre-range. Multi-electrode arrays were ®rst described by Masuda et al (1983Masuda et al ( , 1985a, De Luca and Merletti (1987) and Reucher et al (1987a, b), and have recently become quite important (Roeleveld et al 1997(Roeleveld et al , 1998Sun et al 1999). …”
Section: Review Of the Hsr-emg Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Compared to conventional single-lead recordings, they oer several advantages, one of the most meaningful being that they have been shown to allow the assessment of excitation spread and thus a non-invasive insight into the functional anatomy of the muscle (Masuda et al 1983(Masuda et al , 1985aReucher et al 1987b;Schneider et al 1989;Rau et al 1997b;Roeleveld et al 1997;Merletti et al 1999b). The combination of a two-dimensional Laplace ®lter with a multi-electrode array (HSR-EMG) provides not only information about single MU activity, but also makes the non-invasive assessment of the excitation spread along the muscle ®bres of single MU possible and allows a deeper insight into the structure of the MU.…”
Section: Review Of the Hsr-emg Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique has already proved to be a valuable tool in different fields of basic research (CHANAUD et al, 1987;MASUDA et al, 1983aMASUDA et al, , b, 1985MERLETTI et al, 2003) and clinical applications (DROST et al, 2001;KUMAGAI and YAMADA, 1991;WOOD et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%