The Promise of the Sharing Economy among Disadvantaged Communities

Dillahunt, Tawanna R.; Malone, Amelia R.

doi:10.1145/2702123.2702189

Cited by 233 publications

(164 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

144

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Its revenue, in 2016, has been announced to be $700 million [139]. Although this company has been very famous as an SE company [140][141][142], it has been introduced as an on-demand transportation company, too [139].…”

Section: Lyftmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conceptualizing the Sharing Economy through Presenting a Comprehensive Framework

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:In recent years, through the advances in technology and highlighting the sustainability concepts in different aspects of human lives, the sharing economy has become an interesting topic for researchers, and also, many businesses claim to be active in this environment. However, a comprehensive definition, which is generally accepted, does not yet exist in the literature. In this paper, through a systematic literature review, analysis, and coding, a comprehensive definition, and also, an inclusive framework is presented for the sharing economy. This can help scientists and businesses to clarify which companies or parts of their activities fall into the SE category, and which do not. Such clarification in a small scale is done for five companies at the end of the paper.

show abstract

Section: Lyftmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conceptualizing the Sharing Economy through Presenting a Comprehensive Framework

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Individuals' behavior is impacted when they find emerging opportunities that generate social integration, income, and access to assets that are not available in their lives up to a given moment (Dillahunt & Malone, 2015).…”

Section: Maira Petrini Cássio Stedetn De Freitas Lisilene Mello Da mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Proposal for a Typology of Sharing Economy

Petrini

Freitas²,

Silveira

2017

RAM, Rev. Adm. Mackenzie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este artigo pode ser copiado, distribuído, exibido, transmitido ou adaptado desde que citados, de forma clara e explícita, o nome da revista, a edição, o ano e as páginas nas quais o artigo foi publicado originalmente, mas sem sugerir que a RAM endosse a reutilização do artigo. Esse termo de licenciamento deve ser explicitado para os casos de reutilização ou distribuição para terceiros. Não é permitido o uso para fins comerciais. MAIRA PETRINIPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUC-RS), Porto Alegre -RS, Brazil. CÁSSIO STEDETN DE FREITASEvaluation system: double blind review. Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM). Silvio Popadiuk (Editor-in-chief), Silvio Popadiuk (Associate Editor), p. 39-62. Revista de ABSTRACTPurpose: to propose a typology for sharing economy that allows the characterization and classification of its main forms of manifestation. Originality/value: the theme that involves collaborative consumption and sharing economy has wide definitions with no clear establishment of boundaries between them. Part of that definition gap may occur because of the recent emergency of literature on sharing economy. Additionally, the fact that sharing economy and collaborative consumption are the newest buzzwords, several businesses started calling themselves as such. Design/methodology/approach: from the review of the literature, 11 characteristics that describe the theme were identified. In the light of those characteristics, 72 collaborative consumption websites were analyzed, representatives of the 24 collaborative consumption categories proposed by Botsman and Rogers (2010). Findings: three archetypes were identified: 1. new business models represent the new players based on technological platforms, which are the core business of the company, and generate income by charging service fees; 2. redesigned businesses are traditional market models redesigned to present time and price advantages to the consumer; 3. sharing by ideal is the archetype that best represents sustainable consumption alternative models.

show abstract

“…As digital infrastructure facilitates employment access, the capacity to tap into a variety of informal paid work activities will rely to a greater degree on digital literacy and the digital divide (Dillahunt andMalone, 2015 andKittur et al, 2013).…”

Section: Demographic Profiles Of Respondentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring Online and Offline Informal Work: Findings from the Enterprising and Informal Work Activities (EIWA) Survey

Robles

McGee

2016

FEDS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The growing prevalence of alternative work arrangements has accelerated with the rapidly evolving digital platform transformations in local and global markets (Kenny and Zysman, 2015 and. Although traditional (offline) informal paid work has always been a part of the labor sector (BLS-Contingent Worker Survey, 2005; GAO, 2015 and Katz and Krueger, 2016), the rise of online enabled paid work activities requires new approaches to measure this growing trend (Farrell and Greig, 2016;Gray et al, 2016;Sundararajan, 2016 andSchor, 2015). In the fourth quarter of 2015, the Federal Reserve Board conducted a nationally representative survey of adults 18 and older to track online and offline income-generating activities as well as their employment status during the six months prior to the surveys. Survey results indicate that 36 percent of respondents undertook informal paid work activities either as a complement to or as a substitute for more traditional and formal work arrangements. We explore the rationale behind respondents' participation in alternative work arrangements by setting questions that capture participant motives and attitudes towards informal offline and online paid work activities. Sixtyfive percent of qualified survey respondents indicate that a main reason for participating in informal work is to earn extra income.

show abstract

The Promise of the Sharing Economy among Disadvantaged Communities

Cited by 233 publications

References 22 publications

Conceptualizing the Sharing Economy through Presenting a Comprehensive Framework

Conceptualizing the Sharing Economy through Presenting a Comprehensive Framework

A Proposal for a Typology of Sharing Economy

Exploring Online and Offline Informal Work: Findings from the Enterprising and Informal Work Activities (EIWA) Survey

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About