2020
DOI: 10.1017/s0020818320000442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Promise of Peacekeeping: Protecting Civilians in Civil Wars

Abstract: Do peacekeepers protect civilians in civil conflict? Securing civilian safety is a key objective of contemporary peacekeeping missions, yet whether these efforts actually make a difference on the ground is widely debated in large part because of intractable endogeneity concerns and selection bias. To overcome these issues, we use an instrumental variables design, leveraging exogenous variation in the rotation of African members of the United Nations Security Council and looking at its effects on African civil … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also suggest that robust peacekeeping forces can impose physical barriers between combatants and civilian targets, making violence a less attractive way for armed factions to extract support or resources from local citizens. Carnegie and Mikulaschek (2020) also find that peacekeeping is strongly related to less violence against civilians when one looks at all UN peacekeeping missions deployed to ongoing conflicts between 1989 and 2010. What is particularly noteworthy about this study is that it deals with difficult endogeneity and selection bias issues by using an instrumental variable approachin this case, variation in Security Council membership.…”
Section: Reducing Civilian and Combatant Killing In Civil Warmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…They also suggest that robust peacekeeping forces can impose physical barriers between combatants and civilian targets, making violence a less attractive way for armed factions to extract support or resources from local citizens. Carnegie and Mikulaschek (2020) also find that peacekeeping is strongly related to less violence against civilians when one looks at all UN peacekeeping missions deployed to ongoing conflicts between 1989 and 2010. What is particularly noteworthy about this study is that it deals with difficult endogeneity and selection bias issues by using an instrumental variable approachin this case, variation in Security Council membership.…”
Section: Reducing Civilian and Combatant Killing In Civil Warmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…shows that member states use their position on the Security Council to influence where UN peacekeepers are posted (Mikulaschek 2017;Carnegie and Mikulaschek 2020). However, these theories apply to political elites and armed groups rather than citizens disputing over local issues.…”
Section: Impartiality Conditions Effectiveness Of Local-level Peacekeepingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the longer term, the local peacekeeping presence lowers the level of rebel violence but does not protect citizens from governmental violence (Fjelde 2018: 103). In fact, its ability to curb governmental violence is institutionally restricted because its conduct is based on state consent (Carnegie et. al.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%