2019
DOI: 10.3390/f10100874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Profitability of Cross-Cutting Practices in Butt-Rotten Picea abies Final-Felling Stands

Abstract: Research Highlights: This study offers new information on the cross cutting of decayed stems with the sounding of short (0.5 m) offcuts and the bucking of longer (3.0 m) butt-rotten poles. Background and Objectives: The root and butt-rot fungus Heterobasidion annosum sensu lato (Fr.) Bref. causes wood quality damage to trees in softwood forests. When timber is harvested in butt-rotten forests, it is essential that the decayed part of the tree is recognized and cut away from a stem, while the healthy and good q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The waste pieces of decayed wood are not included in the harvester data (cf. Kärhä et al 2019) although they are included in ALS-based estimates. The same trend has been observed also in earlier studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The waste pieces of decayed wood are not included in the harvester data (cf. Kärhä et al 2019) although they are included in ALS-based estimates. The same trend has been observed also in earlier studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other factors may also have caused errors. For example, retention trees and waste pieces of decayed wood were not included in the harvester data (Kärhä et al 2019), although they are included in the Trestima-based estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All merchantable stem pieces cut in the forest stand, except waste pieces of decayed wood and treetops, were included in the harvester data (Kärhä et al 2019). Sawlog lengths were mainly 3.7-5.5 m at 0.3 m increments.…”
Section: Harvested Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially the case when the quality of cutting is also considered to avoid cutting damage (see Inberg et al 2002) and when additional cuts are also needed. It is also the case when processing rotten parts of the stem (see Kärhä et al 2019). The aim of both is to produce high-quality products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nurminen et al (2006) studied the time consumption for different CTL harvester working elements and showed the average work phase times as a proportion of the total effective time, with felling contributing to 17% and processing 45% of the total in final felling 18% and 27% in thinning. Kärhä et al (2019) mentioned an average share of 61% of processing time (incl. delimbing, cross-cutting, sounding) of total stem processing time in Norway spruce stems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%