1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4573(99)00024-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The production of ‘context’ in information seeking research: a metatheoretical view

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
107
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
107
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The third sense refers to the ways in which the same world can be viewed differently given interpretive assumptions. Talja, Keso, and Pietiläinen (1999) described two approaches to context: the objectified and the interpretative. The main difference between them is that context in the objectified approach is evoked and described philosophically and theoretically while context in the interpretative approach is not understood as an independent entity but rather as a carrier of meaning.…”
Section: Situation and Context Of Information Seekingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third sense refers to the ways in which the same world can be viewed differently given interpretive assumptions. Talja, Keso, and Pietiläinen (1999) described two approaches to context: the objectified and the interpretative. The main difference between them is that context in the objectified approach is evoked and described philosophically and theoretically while context in the interpretative approach is not understood as an independent entity but rather as a carrier of meaning.…”
Section: Situation and Context Of Information Seekingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D. Johnson, 2003;Talja, Keso, & Pietilainen, 1999). The difficulty of deriving testable hypotheses from these models means that they have had little direct impact on the design of retrieval systems, despite the fact that they have had a major impact on our understanding of how people interact with IR systems.…”
Section: User-centred Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches are based on different epistemological claims concerning how information needs and relevance should be defined, and they include different views on instrumentality. The three approaches can be labeled as metatheories, and have as such been described in LIS research literature [6], [7], [8], [cf. 9].…”
Section: Three Approaches To Information Needs Relevance and Instrummentioning
confidence: 99%