2005
DOI: 10.1007/11495222_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Instrumentality of Information Needs and Relevance

Abstract: Abstract. An important question in Library and Information Science (LIS) isfor what purpose information is sought; information seeking is not carried out for its own sake but to achieve an objective that lies beyond the practice of information seeking itself. Therefore, instrumentality could be seen as an overarching principle in the LIS field. Three different epistemological approaches to information needs and relevance, and the views on instrumentality that goes with them, are presented: the structure approa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present article, the neo-pragmatist concept of community of justification is drawn on to illustrate how different tools are used within a particular community, such as a profession and the training for that profession (Sundin & Johannisson, 2005a;Johannisson & Sundin, 2007). Accordingly, a student of nursing makes use of the tools at hand in the community of justification within which the student acts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present article, the neo-pragmatist concept of community of justification is drawn on to illustrate how different tools are used within a particular community, such as a profession and the training for that profession (Sundin & Johannisson, 2005a;Johannisson & Sundin, 2007). Accordingly, a student of nursing makes use of the tools at hand in the community of justification within which the student acts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we intend not just that consideration be given to the content being learned through a lookup-search process: i.e., that in searching for information on flu shots, one comes to plug a defined information need on that topic. Instead, we argue that through searching students can engage in processes beyond verification of uncontentious facts, and into more socio-cultural processes and perspectives on literacy in which knowledge is constructed in negotiation with a particular social and information context (Knight and Littleton 2015;Sundin and Johannisson 2005). In our view, this richer conception of search as learning is fundamentally social in nature, studied well through the lens of collaborative information seeking (CIS).…”
Section: Much Of the Search Time In Learning Search Tasks Is Devoted mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This is seen most clearly in the study of information behaviour through the concept of 'information practices', rooted in the social norms of a community of practitioners; see, for example, Talja and Hansen (2005), Sundin and Johannison (2005), and Savolainen (2008). As Savolainen (2008, p42) puts it, "most researchers agree that a significant characteristic of the concept of information practice is the central role of social and cultural factors qualifying information seeking, use and sharing".…”
Section: Socialisationmentioning
confidence: 99%