1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0308-521x(97)00002-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The production objectives and feeding strategies of ruminant livestock owners in the Gambia: Implications for policy makers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…opportunity cost of feed sources (choosing feeds according to their potential demand in regional markets) and, iii. perception of management and use requirements when a particular strategy is adopted (Fleury et al, 1996;Bennison et al, 1997). However, we agree with Castelán et al (2001) and Arriaga et al (2002) who stated the decision to adopt a particular feeding strategy would be influenced by response of the cattle to a particular ration in terms of efficiency, biological or economic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…opportunity cost of feed sources (choosing feeds according to their potential demand in regional markets) and, iii. perception of management and use requirements when a particular strategy is adopted (Fleury et al, 1996;Bennison et al, 1997). However, we agree with Castelán et al (2001) and Arriaga et al (2002) who stated the decision to adopt a particular feeding strategy would be influenced by response of the cattle to a particular ration in terms of efficiency, biological or economic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Results of this study agreed well with a previous study of Bennison et al (1997) on the production objectives of livestock keepers in the Gambia (with the only noteworthy discrepancy, a higher average rating of cows for draught in this study compared to the previous). This indicates that the objectives for keeping cattle, sheep and goats have generally remained consistent over the last 10 or more years.…”
Section: Specific Objectives For Keeping Cattle Sheep and Goatssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The use of cows (rather than bulls) for draught was strongly location dependent, with the highest observed across-village variation. The relatively low score of cattle for transport (average 2.45) is likely indicative of other species, such as donkeys or horses, fulfilling this role (Bennison et al 1997).…”
Section: Specific Objectives For Keeping Cattle Sheep and Goatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, when the activity is driven by socio-cultural motivations and is more oriented towards auto-consumption than to the market (Lemke et al, 2006;Kumaresan et al, 2009), little effort is made to improve growth performances of animals by seeking feed with high nutritional value. For example, it is reported that, in Gambia, animals are only managed intensively when they make a significant contribution to production and income, but not if savings is their main function (Bennison et al, 1997). Moreover, feeding forage is often used with indigenous pigs, which are the preferred breed of smallholders in rural areas (Lemke et al, 2007;Len et al, 2009a), and investigations in Burkina Faso and Cameroon reveal that under specific conditions the low-input by-products and forage-based sector can even be more profitable than industrial pigsties (Lekule and Kyvsgaard, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%