2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2010.5446973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The processing chain and Cal/Val operations of the future hyperspectral satellite mission EnMAP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. Being the spectral range not constant across all the spectra, each spectrum has been resampled to the 244 bands of the future EnMAP mission's sensor [12], spanning the interval 0.42-2.45 μm, as described in [13]. The dataset looks a difficult one at first sight, as in some occasions the spectra exhibit similar behaviour or overlap (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Being the spectral range not constant across all the spectra, each spectrum has been resampled to the 244 bands of the future EnMAP mission's sensor [12], spanning the interval 0.42-2.45 μm, as described in [13]. The dataset looks a difficult one at first sight, as in some occasions the spectra exhibit similar behaviour or overlap (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It comprises processor elements to generate quality information, quicklooks, water-land masks, cloud masks, tiling, correction of known effects like odd-even and nonuniformity, conversion to physical at-sensor radiance values, direct geo-referencing with image-to-image adjustment and atmospheric corrections separated for land and water surface applications. A detailed description of the EnMAP processing chain is available in [5].…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the FOV (Field-of-View) of 2.63 deg and the IFOV (Instantaneous Field-of-View) of 9.5 arcsec, also characterization data are considered which justify e.g. the MTF (Modular Transfer Function) of more than 0.25 at 60 m and more than 0.64 at 240 m. The geometric characterization and calibration is based on pre-flight simulations and measurements performed in the laboratory [3] and complemented by inflight measurements performed in vicarious characterization and calibration campaigns [1]. Direct Georeferencing…”
Section: Overview Of Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%