2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2009.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The process of team communication in multi-cultural contexts: An empirical study using Bales’ interaction process analysis (IPA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is contrary to several studies (e.g., Liu and Lim, 2006;Shore et al, 2009;Shachaf, 2008;Nam et al, 2008;Staples and Zhao, 2006), that support the negative effect of this factor on the dynamics of collaboration. The explanation presented by these authors is that the difference of value systems within the team leads to disagreements and conflicts, and then to the decomposition of the team into sub-groups that are culturally homogeneous, which affects negatively the collaboration.…”
Section: -17contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result is contrary to several studies (e.g., Liu and Lim, 2006;Shore et al, 2009;Shachaf, 2008;Nam et al, 2008;Staples and Zhao, 2006), that support the negative effect of this factor on the dynamics of collaboration. The explanation presented by these authors is that the difference of value systems within the team leads to disagreements and conflicts, and then to the decomposition of the team into sub-groups that are culturally homogeneous, which affects negatively the collaboration.…”
Section: -17contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The first affirms that having team members coming from several cultures would be a source of differences, conflicts, and anxiety in the team (Shore et al, 2009;Lim and Liu, 2006). what affects negatively the dynamics of collaboration (Nam et al, 2008;Shachaf, 2008). However, other authors defend, and sometimes hardly recommend, the cross-cultural team.…”
Section: Collaboration Components Definition Communicationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also needed commitment, elaboration of strategies and negotiation of different stakeholders in their solution. Nam et al (2009) compared homogeneous to heterogeneous groups and face to face (FTF) communication to computer mediated communications. They concluded that the impact of communication mode on team communication varies by the level of diversity within the team and that one-way to help promote a high performance team, one which is capable of effectively communicating positive socio-emotional, negative socio-emotional, and questioning types of communication patterns is to use a homogenous group of people and allow them to interact using FTF styles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the laboratory studies on small group interaction, IPA has been and is still used to analyze the interaction profile of a group, both in face-to-face (Nam, Lyons, Hwang, & Kim, 2009;Zijlstra, Waller, & Phillips, 2012) and computer-mediated communication (Birnholtz, Steinhardt, & Pavese, 2013;Chou et al, 2002;Maloney-Krichmar & Preece, 2005;Rice & Love, 1987;Savolainen, 2011). The coding scheme of IPA is presented in Table 3.…”
Section: Interaction Process Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%