2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.03.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The process of deforestation in weak democracies and the role of Intelligence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, female representation in parliament may be higher in countries with greater civil rights and political liberties (i.e., in democratic countries). Moreover, related studies suggest that democratization has a U‐shaped association with sustainable development (e.g., Buitenzorgy & Mol, ; Obydenkova et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, female representation in parliament may be higher in countries with greater civil rights and political liberties (i.e., in democratic countries). Moreover, related studies suggest that democratization has a U‐shaped association with sustainable development (e.g., Buitenzorgy & Mol, ; Obydenkova et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, we control for GDP per capita and its squared and cubic term in our empirical analysis. In addition, following Obydenkova, Nazarov, and Salahodjaev (2016), we include GDP growth rates as a proxy for the overall macroeconomic environment. The data are obtained from the World Bank.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third problem concerns country-level differences in national resources, which include fossil fuels, minerals, and timber. Such resources contribute to GDP but are also associated with the "resource curse," in which reliance on natural resources reduces investment in human capital and limits economic growth (e.g., Obydenkova, Nazarov, & Salahodjaev, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…partially free (3-5), and not free (6-7). While some argue democracy should reduce forest loss because it will be accountable to the interests of its citizens (Marquart-Pyatt 2004;Li and Reuveny 2006;Ross 2001;Obydenkova, Nazarov, and Salahodjaev 2016); others argue that democracies may be more partial to companies than environmentalists, and focus more on economic concerns of its citizenry than environmental ones (Midlarsky 1998;Kashwan 2017). From these conflicting arguments, I expect democracy to have no impact on forest loss.…”
Section: Control Variable Selection and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%