2019
DOI: 10.1504/ijrs.2019.097011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The probabilistic analysis of fatigue crack effect based on magnetic flux leakage

Abstract: In this paper, probabilistic analysis on the fatigue crack effect was investigated by applying the Metal Magnetic Memory (MMM) method, based on Self-Magnetic Leakage Field (SMLF) signals on the surface of metal components. The precision of MMM signals is essential in identifying the validity of the proposed method. The tension-tension fatigue test was conducted using the testing frequency of 10 Hz with 4 kN loaded, and the MMM signals were captured using the MMM instrument. As a result, a linear relationship w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If cracks are not detected in time, the cracks will extend during the use of metal structural parts, leading to fracture, causing casualties and property damage, and triggering serious safety accidents [3]. At present, the conventional nondestructive testing methods for metal crack defects mainly include: Ultrasonic Testing [4], Radiographic Testing [5], Magnetic Flux Leakage [6], Eddy Current Testing [7], Penetration Testing [8] and Acoustic Emission [9]. Each technology has corresponding application areas and different defect detection capabilities, but all have certain limitations, such as Ultrasonic Testing and Radiographic Testing for the detection of defects within the metal structure, Magnetic Flux Leakage, Eddy Current Testing and Penetration Testing for the detection of surface and near-surface cracks in metal specimens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If cracks are not detected in time, the cracks will extend during the use of metal structural parts, leading to fracture, causing casualties and property damage, and triggering serious safety accidents [3]. At present, the conventional nondestructive testing methods for metal crack defects mainly include: Ultrasonic Testing [4], Radiographic Testing [5], Magnetic Flux Leakage [6], Eddy Current Testing [7], Penetration Testing [8] and Acoustic Emission [9]. Each technology has corresponding application areas and different defect detection capabilities, but all have certain limitations, such as Ultrasonic Testing and Radiographic Testing for the detection of defects within the metal structure, Magnetic Flux Leakage, Eddy Current Testing and Penetration Testing for the detection of surface and near-surface cracks in metal specimens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%