2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the magnetic flux leakage contraction parameters for the fatigue life prediction of SAE1045 steel specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This made it possible for the method to provide the best assessment of damage severity. [ 37 ]. The dH(y)/dx signals were chosen for additional analysis to identify the severity of the flaws on the surface of the scanned specimen [ 34 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This made it possible for the method to provide the best assessment of damage severity. [ 37 ]. The dH(y)/dx signals were chosen for additional analysis to identify the severity of the flaws on the surface of the scanned specimen [ 34 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of pipeline integrity often involves the implementation of various nondestructive testing techniques (NDT) [49]. These strategies employ a range of NDT modalities, including ultrasonic testing (UT) [55,56], magnetic particle inspection (MPI) [57,58], magnetic flux leakage (MFL) [59][60][61], eddy-current testing [62], guided wave pipeline inspection (GWPI) [63,64], and cathodic protection measurement (CP) [65,66]. Each technique offers unique advantages in its ability to inspect pipelines without causing damage or disruption.…”
Section: Remotely Operated Vehicles (Rov)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the normal segment of magnetic intensity, Hp(y), was used because it provided the best evaluation in terms of damage exposure [16]. The acquired raw signals, normal component of magnetic intensity, Hp(y), were converted to the gradient component of magnetic intensity signals, dH(y)/dx, both in length-based forms.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%