Annals of Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy – 2016 2016
DOI: 10.4337/9781784719166.00018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The principles and practices of delivering experiential entrepreneurship education to mega-classes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers could also include participants with little or no familiarity with business and strategy to determine how much their characteristics affect their approach in the experiential exercise like SBG. Furthermore, it is insightful to run the SBG in mega classes – that is 500 or more students (Pryor, 2016), to examine the student behavior changes in the SBG in such a context.…”
Section: Suggestions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers could also include participants with little or no familiarity with business and strategy to determine how much their characteristics affect their approach in the experiential exercise like SBG. Furthermore, it is insightful to run the SBG in mega classes – that is 500 or more students (Pryor, 2016), to examine the student behavior changes in the SBG in such a context.…”
Section: Suggestions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proponents of experiential approaches to entrepreneurship education acknowledge the pressure for larger classes and the obstacles this places in the way of providing for experiential teaching (Fulgence, 2015; Henry, 2013). A large class can make it difficult to provide for feedback-guided learning (Broadbent et al, 2018; Pryor, 2016). The opportunity to ask for expert advice can be a challenge (Woollacott et al, 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scholarship of teaching and learning literature provides very little guidance on addressing the challenge of class size and experiential learning (Lund Dean & Wright, 2017). In the literature, discussions of large class sizes range from classes of 75+ (Gannaway et al, 2018; Salaber, 2014)), 90+ (Cullen, 2011; Piercy et al, 2012), 120+ (Heaslip et al, 2014; Lund Dean & Wright, 2017), to extremely large 500+ (Bohn & Schmidt, 2008; Pryor, 2016). The definition of “large” remains undefined and, as Lund Dean and Wright (2017) have identified, is often contextual, being defined relative to the constraints such as using a tiered lecture hall, difficulty in using some teaching techniques, and no sustained one-to-one contact with all students.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Putting aside the question of whether students should be viewed as customers, we argue that a megaclass fits the general description of a service system. To explain this view, we sketch a few of the building blocks of a megaclass, based on accounts of teachers who deal with megaclasses in diverse areas such as writing, entrepreneurship, or business …”
Section: The (Statistics) Megaclass As a Complex Service Production Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explain this view, we sketch a few of the building blocks of a megaclass, based on accounts of teachers who deal with megaclasses in diverse areas such as writing, entrepreneurship, or business. 12,15,22 Megaclasses require an adequate infrastructure, ranging from the most basic issue of a large-enough classroom if hundreds of students attend ex-catedra lectures, to sophisticated virtual platforms and teaching/learning support systems if they take lectures and engage with various class activities online. In addition, the megaclass infrastructure also requires a coordinated work process involving a large multi-faceted team consisting of 1 or more (senior) lead teachers, junior lecturers, teaching assistants and/or tutors, and possibly technical personnel or an ICT helpdesk.…”
Section: What Is a Service Production System?mentioning
confidence: 99%