The Pricing of Forward Ship Value Agreements and the Unbiasedness of Implied Forward Prices in the Second-Hand Market for Ships

Abstract

This paper outlines the methodology to price the newly introduced Forward Ship Value Agreements (FOSVAs). FOSVAs are derivatives aimed at managing asset risk in the second-hand markets for bulk vessels and are traded over the counter. We then estimate the implied forward prices from historical data for vessel prices and the term structure of freight rates under the assumption that the cost-of-carry relationship holds and investigate whether the implied forward prices have been unbiased predictors of realised prices. The empirical evidence rejects the unbiasedness hypothesis in all the cases studied and supports the presence of a risk premium. Maritime Economics & Logistics (2004) 6, 109–121. doi:10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100098

Hedging ship price risk using freight derivatives in the drybulk market

“…While there exists a highly liquid and functioning futures markets for freight, interest rates, fuel oil and currency risk, vessel value risk is the only risk that currently cannot be managed through the use of bespoke financial instruments. However, this is perhaps the most important risk to ship owners in terms of dollar exposure (Adland et al 2004).…”

“…The Forward Ship Value Agreement (FoSVA) was introduced as a cash-settled forward contract on the value of the Baltic Sale and Purchase Assessments (BSPA) by Clarkson Securities Limited in 2003 (Adland et al 2004). However, the contracts were never traded, partly due to the lack of a clearing mechanism and associated credit risk (Adland et al 2004). Also, marine insurers have tried to offer residual value insurance products without much success.…”

Ship Acquisition of Shipping Companies by Sale & Purchase Activities for Sustainable Growth: Exploratory Fuzzy-AHP Application

“…A good decision-making model needs to allow uncertainty because fuzziness is a common characteristic of many decision-making problems [42]. Shipping companies' S&P activities are typical multi-criteria decision-making problems owing to the uncertainty prevailing in the shipping market [43]. Therefore, in this section, the fuzzy AHP approach is utilized to identify the priority factors when shipping companies acquire ships for sustainable growth by S&P activities.…”

Motivations behind irrationality in the shipping asset management

“…It is not surprising that the vast volume of the shipping literature indicates that a priori assumptions of the neo-classical school of economics such as rationality or market efficiency may not work in the shipping industry (Alizadeh et al, 2007;Adland and Cullinane, 2005;Adland et al, 2004;Glen, 1997;Alizadeh, 2002a, 2002b;Veenstra, 1999, among others). The existing efforts almost invalidate the rational actor assumption while illustrating the potential of systematic bias (rational irrationality).…”