2001
DOI: 10.1002/cem.688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The price paid for the second‐order advantage when using the generalized rank annihilation method (GRAM)

Abstract: SUMMARYIn a ground-breaking paper, Linder and Sundberg developed a statistical framework for the calibration of bilinear data (Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998; 42: 159-178). Within this framework they formulated three different predictor construction methods (J. Chemometrics accepted), namely a so-called naive method, a least squares (LS) method and a refined version of the latter that takes account of the calibration uncertainty. They showed that the naive method is statistically less efficient than the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They are understood by resorting to the useful concept of net analyte signal (NAS), first developed by Lorber. 37 The sensitivity (SEN) for a particular analyte is estimated as the net analyte signal at unit concentration; the following equation seems to apply to the presently studied case: 38 …”
Section: Figures Of Meritmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are understood by resorting to the useful concept of net analyte signal (NAS), first developed by Lorber. 37 The sensitivity (SEN) for a particular analyte is estimated as the net analyte signal at unit concentration; the following equation seems to apply to the presently studied case: 38 …”
Section: Figures Of Meritmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 Different approaches have been discussed in the literature for computing the figures of merit for higher-order methodologies. [49][50][51][52] As for the sensitivity (SEN), the following equation seems to apply to the presently studied case: [53][54][55] …”
Section: Figures Of Meritmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that the full sensitivities decrease in the presence of other sample constituents, by a degree that depends on the profile overlapping. The selectivity (SEL), in turn, is the ratio between the sensitivity and the total signal, and can be estimated as [53][54][55] …”
Section: Sen = K{[(a T A)*(b T B)]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different approaches have been discussed in the literature for computing the figures of merit. [58][59][60][61] As for the sensitivity, the following equation seems to apply to the presently studied case: [62][63][64] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that the full sensitivities decrease in the presence of other sample constituents, by a degree that depends on the profile overlapping. The selectivity (SEL), in turn, is the ratio between the sensitivity and the total signal, and can be estimated as [62][63][64] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%