2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-022-03021-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence of the anatomical variation in a Turkish population: supernumerary muscle–anconeus epitrochlearis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no significant difference in the prevalence between different genders. The muscle was more commonly present in the right arm (72.2%) than in the left (27.8%), but there is no data on which hand was dominant in these patients [3].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was no significant difference in the prevalence between different genders. The muscle was more commonly present in the right arm (72.2%) than in the left (27.8%), but there is no data on which hand was dominant in these patients [3].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Clinical manifestations. Presence of the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle is typically asymptomatic and is found incidentally [3]. Detection of the AE is most commonly a result of investigating the cause of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) with patients present with tingling and numbness in the 4th and 5th fingers, as well as pain around the elbow.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent MRI studies in healthy adults by Kawahara et al from Nagasaki and Nascimento and Ruiz from Sao Paulo reported moderate true prevalence rates, measuring 11% and 13%, respectively [26,34]. Duran et al from Ankara found a slightly lower prevalence of the AE in an MRI study, estimating it at approximately 8% [10]. In Schertz et al's study from Paris on ulnar neuropathy using highresolution ultrasound, the AE was identified in 16% (23 out of 145) of healthy control elbows [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%