2016
DOI: 10.14740/cr507w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Coronary Artery Disease Patients

Abstract: BackgroundMetabolic syndrome (MetS) is a worldwide health problem, which is growing in Iranian adults. MetS is associated with risk of type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD). In this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of MetS and its individual components in CAD patients.MethodsThis cross-sectional study was performed on 200 CAD patients who had undergone elective coronary angiography at the cardiology department. Anthropometric indices including waist circumference (WC) and body mass ind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
34
0
11

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(62 reference statements)
3
34
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The clearly higher prevalence of MetS in females than in males was supposed to result from the lower metabolic rate with increased body fat percentage in postmenopausal women. The prevalence of MetS from 14.2% in 2012 to 24.4% in 2015 showed a climbing trend similar between male and female, which conformed with the findings of Ranasinghe et al(2017), Montazerifar et al (2016) and Franca et al (2016). The incidence of MetS calculated from the present study (14.1% -22.2%, average: 17.6%) was much lower than the value of 30% as suggested by Van et al (2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The clearly higher prevalence of MetS in females than in males was supposed to result from the lower metabolic rate with increased body fat percentage in postmenopausal women. The prevalence of MetS from 14.2% in 2012 to 24.4% in 2015 showed a climbing trend similar between male and female, which conformed with the findings of Ranasinghe et al(2017), Montazerifar et al (2016) and Franca et al (2016). The incidence of MetS calculated from the present study (14.1% -22.2%, average: 17.6%) was much lower than the value of 30% as suggested by Van et al (2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Compared with non-MetS patients, MetS patients run1 to 4 times higher risks of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Diabetic patients with MetS make 4.9 times higher incidence of cardiovascular disease than those without MetS (Montazerifar, Bolouri, Mahmoudi Mozaffar, & Karajibani, 2016). Patients with MetS also have higher risk of colorectal cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, and gastric cancer (Hu et al, 2017;Uzunlulu, Telci Caklili, & Oguz, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…12 A study in Iran shows 49.5. 13 A report of US population showed about 44% of MetS prevalence in adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%