2013
DOI: 10.2147/clep.s39876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome/ myalgic encephalomyelitis: a meta-analysis

Abstract: PurposeTo perform a meta-analysis to examine variability among prevalence estimates for CFS/ME, according to the method of assessment used.MethodsDatabases were systematically searched for studies on CFS/ME prevalence in adults that applied the 1994 Centers for Disease Control (CDC) case definition.1 Estimates were categorized into two methods of assessment: self-reporting of symptoms versus clinical assessment of symptoms. Meta-analysis was performed to pool prevalences by assessment using random effects mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
112
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
112
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In the UK, adults who attend NHS specialist CFS services have been ill for a median duration of 3 years, and half of those who were employed at the onset of their illness have ceased working (Collin et al, 2011). A meta-analysis of prevalence studies based on clinically-confirmed cases in several countries indicates a prevalence of 0.76% (95% CI 0.23% to 1.29%) (Johnston et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the UK, adults who attend NHS specialist CFS services have been ill for a median duration of 3 years, and half of those who were employed at the onset of their illness have ceased working (Collin et al, 2011). A meta-analysis of prevalence studies based on clinically-confirmed cases in several countries indicates a prevalence of 0.76% (95% CI 0.23% to 1.29%) (Johnston et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimated a ≥3 months' prevalence of 0.90% (95% CI: 0.60 to 1.20), excluding children with depressive symptoms, compared with a pooled prevalence of 0.76% (95% CI: 0.23 to 1.29) for CFS/ME by clinical assessment; and we estimated a prevalence of 2.50% (95% CI: 2.04 to 2.96) by combined parental-and childreport, including children with depressive symptoms, compared with a pooled prevalence of 3.48% (95% CI: 2.36 to 4.60) for self-reported CFS/ME. 44 These comparisons show that selfreported data will overestimate CFS prevalence in children and adults, and they suggest that much of the overreporting can be attributed to depression (which would be excluded in a clinical assessment).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Det er vanskelig å fastslå forekomsten av CFS/ME fordi inklusjonskriteriene i ulike studier har vaert forskjellige (72) . Studier fra USA og England anslår forekomst til 0,2-0,4 % ved bruk av henholdsvis Canada-og Fukudakriteriene (5,73) .…”
Section: Forekomstunclassified