1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1990.tb00672.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence and characteristics of congenital pigmented lesions in newborn babies in Oxford

Abstract: Melanocytic naevi (MN) are recognised risk factors for malignant melanoma but the epidemiology of MN is poorly understood. Some MN are present at birth and the study of congenital lesions is an important first step toward understanding the development of MN in early life. In this study, the prevalence and characteristics of congenital pigmented lesions were documented in 1012 White caucasian newborn babies at a maternity hospital in Oxford. Only 12 babies (1.2%) were found to have pigmented skin marks and each… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies on birthmarks in newborn babies have been previously performed in the USA [6,7,8], Brazil [9] and some European countries [10,11,12,13,14,15]. The frequency of CMN ranged between 0.2 and 6% in these works.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on birthmarks in newborn babies have been previously performed in the USA [6,7,8], Brazil [9] and some European countries [10,11,12,13,14,15]. The frequency of CMN ranged between 0.2 and 6% in these works.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings at birth have been reported. 17 We identified children from this original study still resident in Oxfordshire by matching maternal names and child's date of birth with the Family Health Services Authority (FHSA) general practitioner registration records.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated prevalence of CMN varies widely depending on the study, ranging from 0.5% to 31.7%. 6,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Most are \3 to 4 cm in diameter. Larger ones are less common.…”
Section: Clinical Presentation Key Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%