2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.physo.2020.100052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The presence of toxic metals in popular farmed fish species and estimation of health risks through their consumption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…R f D (mg/person/day) of metals viz. Cr, Co, Cu, Zn, Hg, Pb and Mn is 0.003, 0.02, 0.04, 0.3, 0.0001, 0.004 and 0.046 respectively 20 , 23 28 Hazard index (HI) The HI can be used to assess the additive effects from various heavy metals taken via fish consumption (4) where, HI > 1 refers for consumers experiencing significant health hazards due to non-carcinogenic metals exposure 29 34 Cancer risk(CR) Carcinogenic risk describes the incremental probability of cancer in an individual over a lifetime, due to exposure to a substantial carcinogen CR ×10 –3 (5) where, CSF is the oral slope factor of carcinogens (mg/kg/day) provided by USEPA (2010a, 2010b); CSF values are available only for Cr (0.003 mg/kg/day) and Pb (0.0085 mg/kg/day). The probability of the development of cancer in a consumer would be > 1 in 100,000, when CR values are above 10 −5 24 , 35 44 MCF and MPI This index helps to assess the metal pollution level in the studied fish (6) MPI = (MCf 1 × MCf 2 × MCf 3 × ……….. × MCf n ) 1/n (7) where, MCF 1,2,..n represent the metal contamination factors for the different metals in the tissue sample of a certain species while n is the number of metals studied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…R f D (mg/person/day) of metals viz. Cr, Co, Cu, Zn, Hg, Pb and Mn is 0.003, 0.02, 0.04, 0.3, 0.0001, 0.004 and 0.046 respectively 20 , 23 28 Hazard index (HI) The HI can be used to assess the additive effects from various heavy metals taken via fish consumption (4) where, HI > 1 refers for consumers experiencing significant health hazards due to non-carcinogenic metals exposure 29 34 Cancer risk(CR) Carcinogenic risk describes the incremental probability of cancer in an individual over a lifetime, due to exposure to a substantial carcinogen CR ×10 –3 (5) where, CSF is the oral slope factor of carcinogens (mg/kg/day) provided by USEPA (2010a, 2010b); CSF values are available only for Cr (0.003 mg/kg/day) and Pb (0.0085 mg/kg/day). The probability of the development of cancer in a consumer would be > 1 in 100,000, when CR values are above 10 −5 24 , 35 44 MCF and MPI This index helps to assess the metal pollution level in the studied fish (6) MPI = (MCf 1 × MCf 2 × MCf 3 × ……….. × MCf n ) 1/n (7) where, MCF 1,2,..n represent the metal contamination factors for the different metals in the tissue sample of a certain species while n is the number of metals studied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HI can be used to assess the additive effects from various heavy metals taken via fish consumption HI = n i=k THQ (4) where, HI > 1 refers for consumers experiencing significant health hazards due to non-carcinogenic metals exposure [29][30][31][32][33][34] Cancer risk(CR) Carcinogenic risk describes the incremental probability of cancer in an individual over a lifetime, due to exposure to a substantial carcinogen 53 (with a range from 0.403 to 0.092 mg/kg) and Bashir et al 54 (with a range from 0.54 to 79.08 mg/kg). However, present results have been found to be comparable with those of Sivaperumal et al 55 in muscle tissue of fish in Indian fish markets (0.14 mg/kg to 3.36 mg/kg).…”
Section: Hazard Index (Hi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The life time cancer risk (LTCR) was determined for several of the metals (Cd, As, Cr, Ni, and Pb), oral exposure being considered to bear carcinogenic risks. The cumulative cancer risk arising from exposure to metal carcinogens in consumed foodstuffs is assumed to be a linear sum of each of the individual metal risks [ 40 , 43 , 44 ], and can be obtained by Equation (6): with n = 1, 2 …… n representing the individual metal contaminants/carcinogens in foodstuffs. Equation (6) gives the totality of carcinogenic risk of all the heavy metals present in the seaweed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sum of HQs for all major metals provides the estimated potential for adverse effects from exposures to multiple metals, assuming each to have similar working mechanisms and linear effect upon a given target organ [38,39]. Generally, it is considered that an exposed population is at minimal risk when the hazard index is (HI = Σ HQs) < 1 [38][39][40].…”
Section: Noncarcinogenic Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation