1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1993.tb00994.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Preparation of Frozen Sections for Micrographic Surgery

Abstract: Presently all preparation techniques may introduce some degree of artifact. However, we feel the process described herein is adaptable to all Mohs surgery laboratories and will result in high quality specimens with minimal artifact.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of ice artifact and overall histology, our study, albeit small, strongly supports the previous suggestions by Miller and colleagues 3 and Mellen and colleagues 4 that flash freezing of tissue in an isopentane histobath produces superior histology (Figure 2) and expedites slide preparation. Our MMS surgeons favored histology from flash frozen tissue, and the time to opacify tissue surrounded by embedding medium in the histobath was considerably faster than time to freeze in the cryostat (range 15–40 vs 40–240 seconds).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of ice artifact and overall histology, our study, albeit small, strongly supports the previous suggestions by Miller and colleagues 3 and Mellen and colleagues 4 that flash freezing of tissue in an isopentane histobath produces superior histology (Figure 2) and expedites slide preparation. Our MMS surgeons favored histology from flash frozen tissue, and the time to opacify tissue surrounded by embedding medium in the histobath was considerably faster than time to freeze in the cryostat (range 15–40 vs 40–240 seconds).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Studies aimed at minimizing this ice artifact in MMS frozen sections are scarce. Miller and colleagues 3 noted that choice of embedding media can affect freeze artifact; they also compared liquid nitrogen, isopentane cooled in liquid nitrogen, and the cryostat and heat extractor methods and found that the isopentane method came closest to vitrification of the tissue and that the cryostat method produced varying degrees of ice artifact. Data from the current study do not substantiate these claims, and there is no comparison of the quality of each method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The essence of this treatise is to describe the preparation of peripheral (en face) frozen sections for the purpose of removing skin cancer. The variables to be discussed include removing, grossing, marking, mounting, embedding, freezing, sectioning, adhering, fixing, staining, clearing, and covering slides and mapping residual cancer.…”
Section: The Preparation Of Frozen Sections For Skin Cancer Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous methods and devices have been designed to facilitate these key steps of tissue processing in MMS. Some of these methods are: manual (direct) technique, microscope slide technique, Bard-Parker scalpel, freezing bar technique, plastic "Cryomolds", "Davidson Cryocup" metal molds, Carter's device, Koehn's modification of Carter's device, "Miami Special" clamps, Gormley's device, Motley & Holt's device, Marini's "CryoSystem", Franks' device, and "CryoHist" [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Some inaccuracies of tissue processing are unavoidable and depend on the unique features of a particular device or technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%