2018
DOI: 10.21278/brod69308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Preliminary Design of a Screw Propeller by Means of Computational Fluid Dynamics

Abstract: SummaryThe assessment of hydrodynamic characteristics of a screw propeller in open water test is of crucial significance in the preliminary design stage of a ship. The open water characteristics can be accurately predicted by towing tank measurements. Taking into account the significant advances in computational fluid dynamics which has enabled the numerical assessment of the open water characteristics, the time and the cost of propeller design are significantly reduced. Open water characteristics can be asses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the opposite faces in the −direction, the velocity inlet boundary and pressure outlet boundary conditions were applied. On the other hand, the far field boundaries (bottom, top and side walls) were defined as velocity inlets for the representation of deep water and infinite air conditions, as used by other researchers [44][45][46]. The inlet, outlet, side wall and bottom boundaries were located at a 2.5 distance from the aft perpendicular of the ship, while the top boundary was located at 1.25…”
Section: Geometry and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the opposite faces in the −direction, the velocity inlet boundary and pressure outlet boundary conditions were applied. On the other hand, the far field boundaries (bottom, top and side walls) were defined as velocity inlets for the representation of deep water and infinite air conditions, as used by other researchers [44][45][46]. The inlet, outlet, side wall and bottom boundaries were located at a 2.5 distance from the aft perpendicular of the ship, while the top boundary was located at 1.25…”
Section: Geometry and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the comparison results, the error of hydrodynamic performance coefficients at J=0. 8 Lateral force fluctuations of the propulsion systems with and without PBCF (J=0.8) are illustrated in Fig. 10.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Performance Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%