1977
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2736(77)90350-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The preferential interactions of cholesterol with different classes of phospholipids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
97
1
3

Year Published

1979
1979
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 366 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
10
97
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies showed that feeding dietary SM in rat inhibited cholesterol absorption [6,7] by a mechanism related to the decreased thermodynamic activity of cholesterol in micelles by SM [8], due to close interaction between SM and cholesterol [25,26]. The present study showed that not only SM but also ceramide, the hydrolytic product of SM in the micelles, inhibited cholesterol uptake.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Previous studies showed that feeding dietary SM in rat inhibited cholesterol absorption [6,7] by a mechanism related to the decreased thermodynamic activity of cholesterol in micelles by SM [8], due to close interaction between SM and cholesterol [25,26]. The present study showed that not only SM but also ceramide, the hydrolytic product of SM in the micelles, inhibited cholesterol uptake.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Separation into SM-rich and PUFA-rich phases is further demonstrated by the presence of two endotherms in DSC scans for 16:0-22:6PE/egg SM (1:1 mol), and the introduction of cholesterol first affects the higher temperature endotherm attributed to the SM-rich phase [58]. This approach, of course, is the same methodology Demel et al used to demonstrate cholesterol-SM affinity in the 1970s [22] [59] establishes the presence of motionally distinct SM-rich (more ordered) and PUFA-rich (less ordered) domains that are o20 nm in size, an acceptable size for lipid rafts. Order in the SM-rich (raft) domain is increased more than the PUFArich (non-raft) domain when cholesterol (1:1:1 mol) is added.…”
Section: Pufa's Aversion To Cholesterolmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Particularly noteworthy were cholesterol-and sphingolipid-enriched domains studied in model bilayer membranes in the 1970s by Biltonen and Thompson [21]. An early differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) study by Demel et al [22] that established differential affinity for cholesterol was based on preferential obliteration by the sterol of melting transitions between two component monotectic lipids. This investigation showed that cholesterol association follows the sequence: sphingomyelin4 phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylglycerol4phosphatidyl-choline4phosphatidylethanolamine (SM4PS, PG4PC4 PE).…”
Section: Role Of Cholesterol In Lipid Raftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we do not know why discrete, low-cholesterol membrane regions are formed, there is a possibility that these regions might have different phospholipid compositions, because Demel et al . (15) reported that cholesterol has a preferential affinity for certain kinds of phospholipids such as sphingomyelin .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%