2016
DOI: 10.1037/tra0000088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The predictive value of trauma-related coping self-efficacy for posttraumatic stress symptoms: Differences between treatment-seeking and non–treatment-seeking victims.

Abstract: Pretreatment CSE did not affect recovery during treatment: higher pretreatment CSE perceptions do not give treated individuals an advantage while CSE is predictive of PTSS among untreated victims.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Benight, Cieslak, Molton, & Johnson, 2008; Bosmans, Benight, van der Knaap, Winkel, & van der Velden, 2013). Coping self‐efficacy reduces the individual's stress reaction through positive appraisal of one's capability in coping with the traumatic event and its aftermath (Bosmans, van der Knaap, & van der Velden, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Benight, Cieslak, Molton, & Johnson, 2008; Bosmans, Benight, van der Knaap, Winkel, & van der Velden, 2013). Coping self‐efficacy reduces the individual's stress reaction through positive appraisal of one's capability in coping with the traumatic event and its aftermath (Bosmans, van der Knaap, & van der Velden, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a self-evaluative process in which individuals appraise their own capability to manage a threatening situation (Bandura, 1997). CSE was found to play an important role in psychological recovery after trauma (Bosmans, van der Knaap, & van der Velden, 2016). In a meta-analysis conducted on cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, higher levels of CSE were associated with lower levels of distress and PTSD symptoms (Luszczynska, Benight, & Cieslak, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, many other organizations actively supported the affected residents, including the representative organization of affected residents (BSVE), insurance companies, housing cooperations, residents’ employers, and the municipality of Enschede. Without neglecting the prevalence of severe post-event mental health problems during the years afterwards, we assume that all these activities enhanced the resilience and coping-self efficacy of the affected residents [44, 45]. The way health care and social welfare are organized in the Netherlands may have contributed to our results too.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may explain the fact that affected and non-affected workers did differ in mental health problems, while no differences were found in MHS utilization. Since treatment seeking victims tend to have lower CSE perceptions than nontreatment seeking individuals (Bosmans et al, 2016 ), an alternative explanation could be that victims didn't seek treatment because they had high overall CSE levels. It would be interesting to test this hypothesis in future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%